Denis Bourgeois's profile - activity

This is a warning (Line 201) generated by the OpenStudio SDK - not the Application or SketchUp Plugin. These checks were

This is a warning generated by the OpenStudio SDK - not the Application or SketchUp Plugin. These checks were introduced

Haven't updated to 2024 yet, but it should be something like the following: Is that what you're after?

Haven't updated to 2024 yet, but it should be something like the following: ![image description] (/upfiles/172805463553

(edited answer, in response to your comment below). Re-reading your initial post, you indeed asked a single, specific q

The EnergyPlus Engineering Reference clearly states that e.g. beam solar radiation enters a zone through exterior window

The EnergyPlus Engineering Reference clearly states that e.g. beam solar radiation enters a zone through windows (i.e. n

(edited answer, in response to your comment below). Re-reading your initial post, you indeed asked a single, specific q

@RobinCris : Sorry for the confusion, not my intent. I strongly edited my initial answer in response to your comment. Ho

@RobinCris : Sorry for the confusion, not my intent. I strongly edited my initial answer in response to your comment. Ho

(edited answer, in response to your comment below). Re-reading your initial post, you indeed asked a single, specific q

The EnergyPlus Engineering Reference clearly states that e.g. beam solar radiation enters a zone through windows, i.e. n

"as recommended here," ... where's here? UMH? A missing link to a specific building energy code/standard requirement, pe

You'll find both radiant-convective & convective (only) baseboard models in the OpenStudio Application library. M

Error "EnergyPlus returned a non-zero exit code (1). Check the stdout-energyplus log" Hi, I'm a relatively new user of O

Your severe errors all relate to the same interzone subsurface issue. You can follow the fix described here.

If the OpenStudioApplication suddenly crashes right after clicking on the Geometry tab, there's likely an undiagnosed ge

When the OpenStudioApplication suddenly crashes right after clicking on the Geometry tab, there's likely an undiagnosed

If all 3x nodes share the same Cp curves, there could be no wind pressure driven ventilation. Maybe try single-sided ven

If the all 3x nodes share the same Cp curves, there would be no wind pressure driven ventilation. Maybe try single-sided

If the all 3x nodes share the same Cp curves, there would be no wind pressure driven ventilation. Maybe try single-sided

MHW, I concatenated my initial August 26 comments as an answer to your original question. Cheers. @MHW, you're correc

MHW, I concatenated my initial comments as an answer to your original question. Cheers. @MHW, you're correct on the u

@Thit, your question raises a possible issue with expidf when dealing with an HVACTemplate:IdealLoadAirSystem. As this i

Bonjour @Santos. Without knowing the range of "mortar plaster" conductivities you're looking into, I ran the following v

@Santos, thanks for providing access to the .osm file. See my response here.

Bonjour @Santos. Without knowing the range of "mortar plaster" conductivities you're looking into, I ran the following v

In theory, for a vertical façade cavity under strictly buoyancy-driven flow (no wind), and with equally-sized and equall

Check out past UMH posts for your 2 severe errors and (new) warnings: here here here Re-check the "Thermal Celier" s

@Santos, not sure if there's a queue issue with UMH posts/notifications, but I'm only getting your updates approx. 24h a

Could you provide more information, e.g. 3D view, schematic plans + elevations? Are you looking into guarded hotboxes, o

Could you provide more information, e.g. 3D view, schematic plans + elevations? Are you looking into a guarded hotboxes,

@MHW : EDIT-1 (with image) did not upload (see revision history). Likely not interested in humidification, but rather d

@MHW : EDIT-1 (with image) did not upload (see revision history). You're likely not interested in humidification, but r

@MHW : EDIT-1 (with image) did not upload (see revision history). You're likely not interested in humidification, but r

@MHW : EDIT-1 (with image) did not upload (see revision history). You're likely not interested in humidification, but r

@MHW : EDIT-1 (with image) did not upload (see revision history). You're likely not interested in humidification, but ra

@MHW, I would indeed expect outdoor humidity driving latent cooling loads (more so than internal loads) in CZ1A (hot &am

@MHW, I would indeed expect outdoor humidity driving latent cooling loads (more so than internal loads) in CZ1A (hot &am

"[...] shouldn't both the sensible and latent thermal (cooling/heating) rates be taken into account"? From the IO Refere

The step-by-step solution here works for both horizontal and vertical GSHPs (see Aug. 25 2024 EDIT at the end) with Open

In theory, for a vertical façade cavity under strictly buoyancy-driven flow (no wind), and with equally-sized and equall

In theory, for a vertical façade cavity under strictly buoyancy-driven flow (no wind), and with equally-sized and equall

In theory, for a vertical façade cavity under strictly buoyancy-driven flow (no wind), and with equally-sized and equall