Julien Marrec's profile - activity

It appears this is an issue with OpenStudio itself. Your file appears to be valid gbxml (at least with respect to the Sc

It appears this is an issue with OpenStudio itself. Your file appears to be valid gbxml (at least with respect to the Sc

if you can share the gbxml file and the resulting OSM that'd be helpful.

(I would strongly recommend you stick to ASCII characters, to avoid encoding problems)

Schedule has missing days in its schedule pointers eplusout.err: Program Version,EnergyPlus, Version 9.5.0-de239b2e5f,

Schedule has missing days in its schedule pointers Program Version,EnergyPlus, Version 9.5.0-de239b2e5f, YMD=2021.09.14

Schedule has missing days in its schedule pointers Program Version,EnergyPlus, Version 9.5.0-de239b2e5f, YMD=2021.09.14

you must provide more information so we can have a shot at helping you. The ideal would be to give your model + EPW file

SolarCollector:UnglazedTranspired is not currently wrapped in the OpenStudio SDK. You're left with implementing it as an

Yes, that should affect the autosizing of the equipment that serve that zone.

Yes, that should affect the autosizing of the equipments that serve that zone.

Have you looked at the E+ example files? HP_wICSSolarCollector.idf and SolarCollectorFlatPlateWater.idf are the two that

There is a GUI for Genopt for equest / DOE2 called ExcaliBEM which I've used in the past. It's from SIMEB (Quebec, Canad

There is a GUI for Genopt for equest called ExcaliBEM which I've used in the past. It's from SIMEB (Quebec, Canada)

Please use existing tags and tag your question with the software you're using (EnergyPlus?)

Put an ElectricEquipment with a schedule, and use the schedule actuator "Schedule Value"

That's likely correct, in that case you want to use the feature in API mode, not the Python:Plugin approach.

Which numbers are you looking at exactly? Have you looked at hourly (or even 'Detailed' timestep) results to see when yo

You need to drag the measure "OpenStudio Results" from the "Reporting" dropdown in the library pane to the "Reporting Me

@gclark, please let us know if v1.2.1-rc1 makes your issue disappear, thanks!

It doesn't break the space tab. It just runs super slow due to a stack overflow. It only affects windows. I just created

You haven't overlooked anything. It definitely shouldn't be 0°C for real world applications. It's done on this line http

Obviously you need to change the name of the Surface and the Space to match your actual model...

You need to use the callback functions https://nrel.github.io/EnergyPlus/api/python/runtime.html There are different ca

This isn't the first thread on plenums, but I haven't found a straight answer on this particular point.

Let's say I have a floor to plenum height of 14', then some ceiling tiles (about an inch, that I'm willing to neglect), then a 3' plenum void, then a 1' concrete slab. The floor to floor height is then 18', but considering the fact that the slab is 1', I don't necessarily want to just assume the plenum void is 4' as I would overestimate the volume by a third.

How am I supposed to enter that in EnergyPlus / OpenStudio to respect both the volumes as well as the exterior wall area (and elevations)?

I'm using a CoolingTower:VariableSpeedthat supplies water to my chiller. You can choose mostly between two empirical models:

• YorkCalc
• CoolTools (crossflow).

I'm interested in knowing which one I should pick.

I have noted a couple of factual differences. First, YorkCalc uses 27 coefficients while CoolTools uses 35, but that's not a very useful piece of information to have.

More interestingly, the model boundaries differ quite significantly, YorkCalc accepts a broader range of conditions.

From the Engineering Reference, Tower Heat Rejection, Table 64:

For the record, YorkCalc is the default in E+.

Does this mean YorkCalc is valid for a broader range of conditions, and would be better?

Do you have any guidance as why I should choose one or the other?

python, unlike EP-Launch, works for all platforms, so yes.

(On windows, open powershell or cmd.exe to type these...)

Don't even bother installing something else. The CLI is in the same installation folder of your OpenStudioApplication, s

Don't even bother installing something else. The CLI is in the same insallation folder of your OpenStudioApplication, so

The alternative is to restructure your project and work in unique subfolders. instead of having all .idf in the same fol

As a workaround until better support is given in the OpenStudioApplication you can do this, assuming: Your model is na

Please do your due diligence and SEARCH for questions before opening new ones. https://unmethours.com/question/49584/how

That's more of a Unix question than a specific OpenStudio one. But anyways, when you type openstudio (or any program wit

@Amy Lee, read the docs: https://eppy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/runningeplus.html or just do help(idf.run) Pass output_pr

@Amy Lee, read the docs: https://eppy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/runningeplus.html Pass output_prefix, eg idf.run(output_p

Can you provide the error log you are getting or something? At least detailed steps to reproduce. It's unclear. Your zip

I'm not sure why that happened, I see your account there and will send you a temporary password from my email. It will p

I'm not sure why that happened, I see your account there and will send you a temporary password from my email. It will p

measure.rb#L736: File.open("#{radPath}/options/treg.opt", 'r') do |file| is the line that's throwing, because the file d

help please, "No such file or directory @ rb_sysopen", error radiance Hello i am using OS 3.1.0 and when i try to run te