Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question
2

Refraction of Light in EnergyPlus

asked 2021-08-10 10:44:19 -0600

Khosro's avatar

updated 2021-08-18 12:26:09 -0600

In EnergyPlus, it is possible to find the direction of the beam solar radiation incident on a surface window.

I wondered if EnrgyPlus considers the direction of the Window Transmitted Beam Solar Radiation the same as the incident one?

In reality, the window glass has an index of refraction that causes changes in the transmitted beam solar radiation direction (due to refraction of light) when it comes from a medium with a different index of refraction such as air.

I wanted to know if EnergyPlus considers this direction change when the light passes through media with different indexes of refractions?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

you can check this post link text

obuchely's avatar obuchely  ( 2021-08-11 13:38:43 -0600 )edit

Thanks for the link. I checked it out. But I didn't find anything regarding the refraction of light.

Khosro's avatar Khosro  ( 2021-08-13 18:33:10 -0600 )edit

2 Answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2021-08-14 10:15:05 -0600

updated 2021-08-15 10:28:51 -0600

For questions like this about how EnergyPlus performs calculations, you want to review the Engineering Reference documentation. There is an entire section about Window Calculations, and the index of refraction, $n$, appears in multiple places:

You can also read another Unmet Hours post for more information.

SUMMARY: Yes, EnergyPlus accounts for index of refraction of light and solar passing through windows.

To see the incidence angle as an output variable, your best option is likely the Surface Outside Face Beam Solar Incident Angle Cosine Value. This is from the surface object defining the fenestration (FenestrationSurface:Detailed, e.g.).

This is only for the outside face of the window -- there isn't a similar output variable for the incidence angle at the inside face of the window. However, incidence angles will only change for different materials or mediums due to their different index of refraction (air vs. glass, for example). Therefore, the incidence angle for light/solar passing through air at the outside face of the window will eventually be the same incidence angle for light/solar passing through air at the inside face of the window after transmitting through all glass layers. See image below taken from here), where $\theta_{i1} = \theta_{r2}$.

image description

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thank you for the answer. Yes, I checked the EnergyPlus references, and I am aware of using the index of refraction in some formulations in the EnergyPlus. However, EnergyPlus only uses the index of refraction to obtain some other radiative properties such as transmittance or reflectance. It does not use the index of refraction to consider the incidence angles changes when the light passes through different materials with different indexes of refraction. For instance, you cannot see that EnergyPlus has been used Snell's law.

Khosro's avatar Khosro  ( 2021-08-17 10:40:33 -0600 )edit
0

answered 2021-08-13 18:38:45 -0600

Khosro's avatar

updated 2021-08-18 12:26:30 -0600

Thank you for the answer.

Yes, I checked the EnergyPlus references, and I am aware of using the index of refraction in some formulations in the EnergyPlus.

However, EnergyPlus only uses the index of refraction to obtain some other radiative properties such as transmittance or reflectance. It does not use the index of refraction to consider the incidence angles changes when the light passes through different mediums with different indexes of refraction. For instance, you cannot see that EnergyPlus has been used Snell's law:

image description

I think, as you mentioned with the image, because the direction of light after it passes through the glass window is the same as the direction before it, EnergyPlus ignore the angle changes inside the glass layers. But, it definitely makes some errors (although small) in calculations, such as shadow calculating inside the building.

Therefore, again I emphasize my previous conclusion:

"EnergyPlus does not consider the refraction of light (incidence angles changes due to pass light through the mediums with different indexes of refraction) in calculations".

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

1

Your conclusion seems right.

MohammadAli's avatar MohammadAli  ( 2021-08-18 11:29:18 -0600 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Training Workshops

Careers

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2021-08-10 10:40:32 -0600

Seen: 237 times

Last updated: Aug 18 '21