First time here? Check out the Help page!
2023-03-08 12:19:32 -0500 | commented answer | How can I link jEPlus and CONTAM? @divsood04 I have uploaded the tools to the NIST Multizone Modeling website. https://w3auth.nist.gov/el/energy-and-envir |
2023-03-08 12:19:01 -0500 | commented answer | How can I link jEPlus and CONTAM? @divsood04 I have uploaded the tools to the NIST Multizone Modeling website. link text. |
2022-12-27 09:53:47 -0500 | answered a question | How can I link jEPlus and CONTAM? I have not used jEPlus. My understanding is that it will generate a set of IDFs with the range of inputs that you desire |
2020-03-09 11:57:48 -0500 | commented answer | Error: ExternalInterface/CalcExternalInterfaceFMUImport: Error when trying to initialize The CONTAM documentation states that the FMU must be located along side the IDF and that the FMU will be unpacked during |
2020-03-09 11:25:00 -0500 | commented answer | Error: ExternalInterface/CalcExternalInterfaceFMUImport: Error when trying to initialize The CONTAM documentation states that the FMU must be located along side the IDF and that the FMU will be unpacked during |
2020-03-09 10:43:01 -0500 | answered a question | Error: ExternalInterface/CalcExternalInterfaceFMUImport: Error when trying to initialize The CONTAM documentation states that the FMU must be located along side the IDF and that the FMU will be unpacked during |
2019-11-04 05:48:31 -0500 | answered a question | DOE's Residential Prototype Building Models Version update You need the Windows - Programs for converting older pre-v7.2.0 IDF files to current (or intermediate) versions. [http:/ |
2019-10-08 05:25:09 -0500 | answered a question | How can I define the heat capacity of the room air of a zone? Look at ZoneCapacitanceMultiplier:ResearchSpecial under the Simulation Parameters group. |
2019-06-14 09:03:18 -0500 | answered a question | Modeling air filter in EnergyPlus to capture particulates during natural ventilation between indoors and outdoors Jason is correct that co-simulation will provide a more general approach that allows you to directly incorporate filters |
2019-02-25 14:32:16 -0500 | received badge | ● Commentator |
2019-02-25 14:32:16 -0500 | commented answer | Issues with multiple FunctionalMockupUnitImport:To:Variables for same FMU. Please tell me how to transition my test IDF to be compatible with this version. |
2018-12-19 06:55:16 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2018-12-12 07:59:12 -0500 | answered a question | Issues with multiple FunctionalMockupUnitImport:To:Variables for same FMU. In order to get around this issue one can use ExternalInterface:FunctionalMockupUnitImport:To:Schedule instead of Extern |
2018-11-15 12:57:19 -0500 | commented question | Issues with multiple FunctionalMockupUnitImport:To:Variables for same FMU. The function GetRuntimeLanguageUserInput() in RuntimeLanguageProcessor.cc is creating an ErlVariable for each alpha fie |
2018-11-09 16:21:33 -0500 | edited question | Issues with multiple FunctionalMockupUnitImport:To:Variables for same FMU. FunctionalMockupUnitImport I'm receiving the following errors when trying to perform co-simulation having more than one |
2018-11-09 16:12:17 -0500 | edited question | Issues with multiple FunctionalMockupUnitImport:To:Variables for same FMU. FunctionalMockupUnitImport I'm receiving the following errors when trying to perform co-simulation having more than one |
2018-11-09 16:11:32 -0500 | edited question | Issues with multiple FunctionalMockupUnitImport:To:Variables for same FMU. FunctionalMockupUnitImport I'm receiving the following errors when trying to perform co-simulation having more than one |
2018-11-09 16:09:35 -0500 | asked a question | Issues with multiple FunctionalMockupUnitImport:To:Variables for same FMU. FunctionalMockupUnitImport I'm receiving the following errors when trying to perform co-simulation having more than one |
2018-10-11 07:59:39 -0500 | edited question | Create DOE Prototype Building measure Error Create DOE Prototype Building measure Error "Process exited with non-zero exit code of: 1" when trying to apply this mea |
2018-07-23 08:30:28 -0500 | commented answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. There is no need to use 3DExport (it is packaged with an old exe and dll that won't change until we release a new versio |
2018-07-20 07:53:24 -0500 | commented answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. Then I assume you are not using the updated program that I mentioned. It contains updates and fixes including a fix of t |
2018-07-19 07:58:59 -0500 | commented answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. You can check the sizing summaries to find that out. |
2018-07-19 05:57:07 -0500 | commented answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. Ridiculous values notwithstanding, I'm not sure what you're expecting to see. Your modifications should only affect the |
2018-07-18 08:43:19 -0500 | commented answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. NOTE: I have recently uploaded a pre-release update to ContamFMU to the Files section of the CONTAM user group. This ver |
2018-07-18 08:35:36 -0500 | commented answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. Yes, it's right to say that - infiltration and interzone airflow. E+ airflow network (AFN) and CONTAM are essentially |
2018-07-18 08:34:58 -0500 | commented answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. Yes, it's right to say that - infiltration and interzone airflow. E+ airflow network (AFN) and CONTAM are essentially |
2018-07-17 14:14:24 -0500 | commented answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. As I understand it, the ZoneLoadComponentSummary report is based on the Sizing conditions and not the simulation RunPeri |
2018-07-17 11:01:28 -0500 | commented answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. I'm not sure how you are determining the "infiltration load becomes zero". E+ should calculate and report the infiltrat |
2018-07-17 10:06:05 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2018-07-17 10:06:05 -0500 | edited answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. I'm assuming you've used the Contam3DExporter to generate your IDF file. As indicated in the CONTAM documentation (quote |
2018-07-17 09:59:31 -0500 | edited answer | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. I'm assuming you've used the Contam3DExporter to generate your IDF file. As indicated in the CONTAM documentation (quote |
2018-07-17 06:28:35 -0500 | answered a question | After successfully coupling CONTAM and Energy+, CONTAM does not calculate design flow rate based on design day information. ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate is zero. I'm assuming you've used the Contam3DExporter to generate your IDF file. As indicated in the CONTAM documentation (quote |
2017-08-11 09:16:14 -0500 | answered a question | changing building geometry in idf file Likely the OS gurus will have suggestions, but depending on your requirements for building geometry you could use the fo |
2017-04-26 08:52:53 -0500 | answered a question | Adding infiltration correlated for weather and building characteristics I believe you can do as Lisa suggested from within OS as well via Spaces -> Properties -> Airflow -> Space Infi |
2017-01-10 10:32:17 -0500 | asked a question | File permission error unpacking ContamFMU on Linux I'm porting co-simulation between EnergyPlus and CONTAM from Windows to Linux. When EnergyPlus extracts the FMU, the file permissions are not maintained. Executable permissions are removed from both the contamx.exe executable and the ContamFMU.so shared object file located in the binaries/linux64 folder of the FMU. I receive the following error:
If I simply extract the files from the FMU directly, permissions are retained. I am assuming there is some linux setting I've not set correctly, but I am no linux expert. I am running Ubuntu 14.04 in a VirtualBox. Any help would be much appreciated. |
2016-09-14 13:43:25 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2016-09-14 12:56:43 -0500 | asked a question | Create DOE Prototype Building measure Error "Process exited with non-zero exit code of: 1" when trying to apply this measure. Using OS v 12.4 and 12.5.DL is deprecated, please use Fiddle E:/Program Files/OpenStudio 1.12.5/ruby-install/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0/gems/openstudio-standards-0.1.4/lib/openstudio-standards/utilities/simulation.rb:9:in `mkdir': No such file or directory - false/SizingRun1 (Errno::ENOENT) Script executing from: C:/Users/xxx/AppData/Local/Temp/OpenStudio.D13588/ApplyMeasureNow/UserScript Found argument 'building_type' with value 'RetailStandalone'. Found argument 'template' with value '90.1-2013'. Found argument 'climate_zone' with value 'ASHRAE 169-2006-5B'. Found UserScript 'Create DOE Prototype Building'. [openstudio.EpwFile] <0> Successive data points (1986-Jan-31 to 1987-Feb-01, ending on line 753) are greater than 1 day apart in EPW file 'E:/Program Files/OpenStudio 1.12.5/ruby-install/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0/gems/openstudio-standards-0.1.4/data/weather/USA_ID_Boise.Air.Terminal.726810_TMY3.epw'. Data will be treated as typical (TMY) [openstudio.setFileExtension] <0> Path p, 'E:/Program Files/OpenStudio 1.12.5/ruby-install/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0/gems/openstudio-standards-0.1.4/data/weather/USA_ID_Boise.Air.Terminal.726810_TMY3.ddy', has an unexpected file extension. Was expecting 'idf'. [openstudio.energyplus.GeometryTranslator] <0> Could not find GlobalGeometryRules object, assuming defaults [openstudio.energyplus.GeometryTranslator] <0> Could not find Building object, assuming 0 rotation [openstudio.energyplus.GeometryTranslator] <0> Could not find Building object, assuming 0 rotation [openstudio.energyplus.GeometryTranslator] <0> Could not find Building object, assuming 0 rotation [openstudio.energyplus.GeometryTranslator] <0> Could not find Building object, assuming 0 rotation [openstudio.model.YearDescription] <1> 'UseWeatherFile' is not yet a supported option for YearDescription [openstudio.model.YearDescription] <1> 'UseWeatherFile' is not yet a supported option for YearDescription Could not find .stat file for: E:/Program Files/OpenStudio 1.12.5/ruby-install/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0/gems/openstudio-standards-0.1.4/data/weather/USA_ID_Boise.Air.Terminal.726810_TMY3.stat. |
2016-08-19 12:09:37 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2016-08-19 12:09:22 -0500 | answered a question | Why does this measure not download? This measure can now be downloaded using OS version 1.12.2 +. |
2016-07-29 12:55:27 -0500 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2016-07-29 10:20:41 -0500 | answered a question | Options for setting infiltration rates in Energy Plus You could use CONTAM to perform simulations to determine infiltration rates using the leakage rate obtained from the blower door test. Further, you can adjust the wind speed modifier based on terrain. NIST provides another tool to export the CONTAM infiltration results to a related EnergyPlus model to populate the I realize that this adds another tool to your simulation workflow, but if you know you will use this method before you create your E+ model, then you can generate the E+ IDF file from the CONTAM project. The above information is detailed in documentation provided by NIST: CONTAM to EnergyPlus infiltration - http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.1873 Commercial building infiltration - http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-public... Exporting CONTAM to EnergyPlus - http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-public... |