First time here? Check out the Help page!
2015-10-30 09:40:06 -0500 | commented answer | Percent savings for a building optimized with an energy model Very good. Thank you. This is all very helpful/insightful. |
2015-10-29 16:27:09 -0500 | commented answer | Percent savings for a building optimized with an energy model This is what I had in mind when I referred to an 'optimized' building. I hope that makes sense. Thanks for your comments, too, by the way. They were great. |
2015-10-29 16:26:27 -0500 | commented answer | Percent savings for a building optimized with an energy model This is in comparison to an 'optimized' building through energy modeling with a goal of reducing the annual utility bill by 30%. Let's say the design and energy modeling team was successful in saving this amount and the new annual bill is $42,840/year. In addition, the extra cost to design and build this 'energy efficient' building was $200,000. Therefore, the annual savings are $18,360/year in utility bills divided into the $200,000 in extra costs for a 10.89 year simple packsack for the developer on a building with a 30-40 year useful life. |
2015-10-29 16:17:24 -0500 | commented answer | Percent savings for a building optimized with an energy model Here's an example to clarify 'optimization': A developer hires an architect to design a commercial office space for him in let's say Albuquerque, New Mexico. After finishing the design, the architect recommends a general contractor that goes out and builds it for the developer a year later with no energy modeling done. The utility bill on that building is 250,000kWh's a year x $.12/kWh = $30,000/year in energy charges. The peak demand is roughly 130kW's a month x $20/kW = $31,200 in demand charges. The total annual utility bill for this property is $61,200 a year. |
2015-10-28 12:17:22 -0500 | commented answer | Percent savings for a building optimized with an energy model Thanks, Amir. Greatly appreciate the follow-up answer... |
2015-10-28 11:35:47 -0500 | commented answer | Percent savings for a building optimized with an energy model Thanks, Lincoln. I guess I'm just trying to understand the business case for BEM. Is it regulatory/certification/group, i.e., AIA 2030, commitment that's driving it or is it a financial case? If it's the latter, what are the rules of thumbs for calculating ROI, NPV, etc., once you assume the building is/will be operated correctly. |
2015-10-28 11:32:30 -0500 | commented answer | Percent savings for a building optimized with an energy model This is a great response, too, Rohini. Thank you. |
2015-10-28 11:28:04 -0500 | commented answer | Percent savings for a building optimized with an energy model Thank you, Amir. This is a very helpful response. Other than code-compliance and/or LEED points, and then there's the AIA 2030 Commitment, what's driving the up-tick in interest in BEM? Is it regulatory as is the case in California or is it post-occupancy M&V? If it's the latter, are you seeing this as a new revenue stream for architects or is LEED starting to mandate M&V to maintain certification? |
2015-10-27 19:57:22 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2015-10-27 19:45:36 -0500 | asked a question | Percent savings for a building optimized with an energy model What can a commercial building owner expect to save on his utility bills with a building (new construction) that was optimized with an energy model versus one that was built without one? I know the earlier you get an energy modeler on board the better = more savings, but is there a standard rule of thumb like 10-20% utility bills savings? |