Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

What are "Initial Design" and "Design" in the summary report when running Coincident sizing?

When we run simulation with Coincident sizing, the html summary report shows Initial Design Capacity/Flow Rate/Power Consumption, etc. and Design Capacity/Flow Rate/Power Consumption, etc. I can't find clear explanation of these Initial Design values and Design values in I/O Reference and Engineering Reference. Does anyone know what they mean?

I guess that Initial Design values are intermediate products during Coincident sizing and Design values are the final results of Coincident sizing which are used in annual simulation.

However, I often get weird results. As an example, I show you the chiller sizing results of NonCoincident sizing and Coincident sizing with 5ZoneVAV-Pri-SecLoop.idf (V23-2-0) below.

image description

The chiller capacity is

Initial Design Capacity in Coincident sizing < Design Capacity in NonCoinsident sizing << Design Capacity in Coincident sizing.

Due to the nature of Coincident sizing, it cannot be greater than NonCoincident sizing. I think Coincident sizing in EnergyPlus has many bugs and is unusable, but the bugs will be fixed later. I first want to know what Initial Design and Design mean.

What are "Initial Design" and "Design" in the summary report when running Coincident sizing?

When we run simulation with Coincident sizing, the html summary report shows Initial Design Capacity/Flow Rate/Power Consumption, etc. and Design Capacity/Flow Rate/Power Consumption, etc. I can't find clear explanation of these Initial Design values and Design values in I/O Reference and Engineering Reference. Does anyone know what they mean?

I guess that Initial Design values are intermediate products during Coincident sizing and Design values are the final results of Coincident sizing which are used in annual simulation.

However, I often get weird results. As an example, I show you the chiller sizing results of NonCoincident sizing and Coincident sizing with 5ZoneVAV-Pri-SecLoop.idf (V23-2-0) below.

image description

The chiller capacity is

Initial Design Capacity in Coincident sizing < Design Capacity in NonCoinsident sizing << Design Capacity in Coincident sizing.

Due to the nature of Coincident sizing, it cannot be greater than NonCoincident sizing. I think Coincident sizing in EnergyPlus has many bugs and is unusable, but unusable. Hopefully the bugs will be fixed later. I at some point. As a first step, I want to know what Initial Design and Design mean.

What are "Initial Design" and "Design" in the summary report when running Coincident sizing?

When we run simulation with Coincident sizing, the html summary report shows Initial Design Capacity/Flow Rate/Power Consumption, etc. and Design Capacity/Flow Rate/Power Consumption, etc. I can't find clear explanation of these Initial Design values and Design values in I/O Reference and Engineering Reference. Does anyone know what they mean?

I guess that Initial Design values are intermediate products during Coincident sizing and Design values are the final results of Coincident sizing which are used in annual simulation.

However, I often get weird results. As an example, I show you the chiller sizing results of NonCoincident sizing and Coincident sizing with 5ZoneVAV-Pri-SecLoop.idf (V23-2-0) below.

image description

The chiller capacity is

Initial Design Capacity in Coincident sizing < Design Capacity in NonCoinsident sizing << Design Capacity in Coincident sizing.

Due to the nature of Coincident sizing, it cannot be greater than NonCoincident sizing. I think Coincident sizing in EnergyPlus has many bugs and is unusable. Hopefully the bugs will be fixed at some point. As a first step, I want to know what Initial Design and Design mean.