Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

Interzone Floor Cooling Load in Zone Component Load Summary

Hello, I am using Zone Component Load Summary to find the estimated contribution of each heat source to the peak cooling load in my building. To exclude the ground heat transfer contribution for my cooling load, I am using the adiabatic surface for my ground surface on the first floor. I expect to see nearly zero contribution of ground contact floor in my Zone Component Load Summary result, and yes it's true. However, I see a negative number in the Interzone Floor result, which I didn't see before when I defined the ground as usual with ground temperature. What I understand from the Interzone heat transfer is that the number represent how much is the heat transferred from one zone to other adjacent zones. But the zone is located on the first floor, where the ground is not in contact with other zone surfaces.

I am just wondering, during the calculation of Zone Component Load Summary, what is the difference of calculating the contribution of Interzone Floor and Ground Contact Floor, and why the number is negative for the Interzone Floor? Is this because of the stored heat in the ground surface?

I could not check the heat transfer for each surface because I have more than 150 surfaces which are too much and would not be able to be displayed all in the result.

Thank you.

Interzone Floor Cooling Load in Zone Component Load Summary

Hello, I am using Zone Component Load Summary to find the estimated contribution of each heat source to the peak cooling load in my building. To exclude the ground heat transfer contribution for my cooling load, I am using the adiabatic surface for my ground surface on the first floor. I expect to see nearly zero contribution of ground contact floor in my Zone Component Load Summary result, and yes it's true. However, I see a negative number in the Interzone Floor result, which I didn't see before when I defined the ground as usual with ground temperature. What I understand from the Interzone heat transfer is that the number represent how much is the heat transferred from one zone to other adjacent zones. But the zone is located on the first floor, where the ground is not in contact with other zone surfaces.

I am just wondering, during the calculation of Zone Component Load Summary, what is the difference of calculating the contribution of Interzone Floor and Ground Contact Floor, and why the number is negative for the Interzone Floor? Is this because of the stored heat in the ground surface?

I could not check the heat transfer for each surface because I have more than 150 surfaces which are too much and would not be able to be displayed all in the result.

Thank you.

Interzone Floor Cooling Load Contribution in Zone Component Load Summary

Hello, I am using Zone Component Load Summary to find the estimated contribution of each heat source to the peak cooling load in my building. To exclude the ground heat transfer contribution for my cooling load, I am using the adiabatic surface for my ground surface on the first floor. I expect to see nearly zero contribution of ground contact floor in my Zone Component Load Summary result, and yes it's true. However, I see a negative number in the Interzone Floor result, which I didn't see before when I defined the ground as usual with ground temperature. What I understand from the Interzone heat transfer is that the number represent how much is the heat transferred from one zone to other adjacent zones. But the zone is located on the first floor, where the ground is not in contact with other zone surfaces.

I am just wondering, during the calculation of Zone Component Load Summary, what is the difference of calculating the contribution of Interzone Floor and Ground Contact Floor, and why the number is negative for the Interzone Floor? Is this because of the stored heat in the ground surface?

I could not check the heat transfer for each surface because I have more than 150 surfaces which are too much and would not be able to be displayed all in the result.

Thank you.

Interzone Floor Contribution in Zone Component Load Summary

Hello, I am using Zone Component Load Summary to find the estimated contribution of each heat source to the peak cooling load in my building. To exclude the ground heat transfer contribution for my cooling load, I am using the adiabatic surface for my ground surface on the first floor. I expect to see nearly zero contribution of ground contact floor in my Zone Component Load Summary result, and yes it's true. However, I see a negative number in the Interzone Floor result, which I didn't see before when I defined the ground as usual with ground temperature. What I understand from the Interzone heat transfer is that the number represent how much is the heat transferred from one zone to other adjacent zones. But the zone is located on the first floor, where the ground is not in contact with other zone surfaces.

I am just wondering, during the calculation of Zone Component Load Summary, what is the difference of calculating the contribution of Interzone Floor and Ground Contact Floor, and why the number is negative for the Interzone Floor? Is this because of the stored heat in the ground surface?

I could not check the heat transfer for each surface because I have more than 150 surfaces which are too much and would not be able to be displayed all in the result.

Thank you.