 | 1 | initial version |
i added pv to my Openstudio model, i did get the extra generated energy in my simulation results yet there was no change to the thermal loads which i think is weird since the material is different, the conductivity shall be different too thus the thermal loads must change? any idea what went wrong! Model pic Osm Model i know there has been another question on using Pv in energyplus Pv shading effect on energyplus
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
i added pv to my Openstudio model, i did get the extra generated energy in my simulation results yet there was no change to the thermal loads which i think is weird since the material is different, the conductivity shall be different too thus the thermal loads must change? any idea what went wrong! Model pic Osm Model i know there has been another question on using Pv in energyplus Pv shading effect on energyplus i also tried to use a pv layer unattached to the roof in case if that was the problem as you can see here but thermal loads increased by around 16% which i don't understand because loads are supposed to decrease since shading effect should be helping in reducing cooling loads.
| | 3 | retagged |
i added pv to my Openstudio model, i did get the extra generated energy in my simulation results yet there was no change to the thermal loads which i think is weird since the material is different, the conductivity shall be different too thus the thermal loads must change? any idea what went wrong! Model pic Osm Model i know there has been another question on using Pv in energyplus Pv shading effect on energyplus i also tried to use a pv layer unattached to the roof in case if that was the problem as you can see here but thermal loads increased by around 16% which i don't understand because loads are supposed to decrease since shading effect should be helping in reducing cooling loads.
