Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question

How to model reasonable VRF EIRFPLR curve with insufficient data

asked 2023-01-22 14:42:29 -0600

Keigo's avatar

I referred to this great paper and customized VRF performance curves by regresson analysis.

I used Daikin's techinical data. The technical data are sufficient except for Part‐Load Performance Data. There are power input data with PLR between 0.5 to 1.3. Data with PLR between 0.1 to 0.5 are missing. image description

The situation is the same with the paper I mentioned above. So, I think VRF manufacturers do not normally provide power input data with PLR less than 0.5. If that's the case, is it acceptable to predict EIRFPLR curve in the absence of data with PLR less than 0.5? That's my question.

The regression analysis of CoolingEIRLowPLR is as follows. image description

image description

The chart below compares CoolingEIRLowPLR curves with the default one in EnergyPlus and the customised one from Daikin technical data. The curve circled in red is the part supplemented by regression analysis.

image description

For clarity, let's change the chart a bit. I divided PLR by CoolingEIRLowPLR. The chart below can be regarded as the correction factor for cooling COP. This chart is more familiar, at least to me.

image description

The default curve in EnergyPlus has a poor COP at low part load. I think this default curve is out of date. Below is an extract from Daikin's VRF catalogue issued in 2015. The compressor efficiency at low PLR already improved a lot in 2015. However, the customised curve by regression analysis appears to overestimate the efficiency at low part load a little. That's what bothers me. image description

I don't want to use the default poor EIRFPLR curve, but the customized EIRFPLR curve might be too good. Can I use the customised EIRFPLR curve? Or is there any way to improve the accuracy of regression analysis with insufficient data at low PLR?

The regression data can be found here for your reference.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2023-01-23 04:47:45 -0600

Jim Dirkes's avatar

Keigo, As usual, you are giving thoughtful consideration to the problem - I appreciate that very much. I think there are two choices:

1) EnergyPlus normally has curves which are based on real equipment and thus are reasonable for use. So... feel confident to use them.

2) As you note, the E+ curves may be out of date for equipment which has seen ongoing improvement. In that case, you can justify and use your "best understanding" for a new curve - much like you are doing already.

Daikin (or other manufacturer) may be able to give you better information than what is published, so it's worth asking for it. On the other hand, the impact of greater accuracy for one curve among many - plus the MANY other variables in your simulation - is probably small. ie, it's probably not worth spending a lot of time trying to get it "perfect".

edit flag offensive delete link more

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Training Workshops

Question Tools

1 follower


Asked: 2023-01-22 14:42:29 -0600

Seen: 62 times

Last updated: Jan 23