First time here? Check out the Help page!

Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question
3

How to access BeOpt material database to add options?

asked 2 years ago

albert9600's avatar

updated 2 years ago

I am trying to simulate a building with different combinations of continuous and cavity insulation materials. In order to have a combination of continuous and cavity insulation, both a wood frame option and a wall sheathing with continuous insulation option. However, when creating a new wall sheathing option, there are only two choices for continuous insulation: polyiso and XPS. How can I add more material options for continuous insulation? From trying to research and find a solution to this I believe it can be done in the BeOpt options library spreadsheet, but I cannot figure out how to access this.

Preview: (hide)

Comments

You want Tools > Option Manager, but as Scott has noted, material (currently) only matters for materials and installation costs.

jpierce's avatar jpierce  ( 2 years ago )

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2 years ago

The choice of insulation material has no effect on the energy simulation as the insulation R-value is an input as well. The insulation material is only an input because there is a difference in cost between different insulation materials. If you don't care about costs, you can safely ignore it. If you do care about costs, you can enter in your own cost data.

Preview: (hide)
link

Comments

Thank you, this is helpful! Do you know how to access the options library spreadsheet?

albert9600's avatar albert9600  ( 2 years ago )

There is no options library spreadsheet anymore. You've probably read something that refers to a very old version of BEopt.

shorowit's avatar shorowit  ( 2 years ago )

@shorowit This is actually something I was thinking about recently, ELA credit for closed-cell spray foam to provide an effective reduction on air sealing cost*... although the fiscal impact might not be enough to make CCF more competitive, and is certainly not worth holding up 3.0 for.

*A case could also be made for properly offset and taped continuous XPS/polyiso to also have a small impact on air leakage.

jpierce's avatar jpierce  ( 2 years ago )

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Training Workshops

Careers

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2 years ago

Seen: 437 times

Last updated: Aug 10 '22