Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get s tarted with the Help page
Ask Your Question
2

BEopt geometry issue

asked 2021-07-14 09:54:41 -0600

mfath gravatar image

updated 2021-07-15 11:07:27 -0600

Hi,

I have created a 2400 Sq.ft res building in BEopt. There is an unfinished 1200 Sqft basement. Two living floors each 1200 sqft and an unfinished attic of 1200 sqft. I am expecting that the Table output of the E+ file shows 2400 sqft of conditioned area; however, my output is 3610.7 sqft. I would appreciate it if someone could provide some insights about this.

Best, Mohammad

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

Can you attach your BEopt project file and/or provide screenshots? I just drew the building you described and got the correct result in the E+ table output file.

shorowit gravatar image shorowit  ( 2021-07-14 10:06:53 -0600 )edit

@shorowit Sure. Please see the BEopt file using the link below: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17KNb... I would appreciate your thoughts.

Best, Mohammad

mfath gravatar image mfath  ( 2021-07-14 15:13:42 -0600 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2021-07-15 10:16:30 -0600

I identified the "issue". EnergyPlus is characterizing the unfinished basement thermal zone as conditioned because it has a WaterHeater:HeatPump:WrappedCondenser (heat pump water heater) in it, even though there is no space heating/cooling equipment serving it. So the BEopt model is defined correctly, but EnergyPlus is not able to correctly infer the conditioned zones.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thank you very much @shorowit. I really appreciate your time and consideration

mfath gravatar image mfath  ( 2021-07-15 11:06:16 -0600 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

 

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2021-07-14 09:54:41 -0600

Seen: 66 times

Last updated: Jul 15