Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get s tarted with the Help page
Ask Your Question
2

Window heat transfer

asked 2021-03-18 12:06:44 -0500

asro gravatar image

updated 2021-03-24 09:21:59 -0500

Hello all,

I already looked at previous questions but I still can not find an answer:

For a simple energy plus model, a room with one southside two pane glass window ( no frame, no divider, etc...)just glass:

(Surface Window Heat Loss Energy) is not equal to (Window Inside Face Net Surface Thermal Radiation Heat Gain Energy) and (Window Inside Face Convection Heat Gain Energy).

The calculation is for 1 am, so there is no solar radiation. There is no light and internal heat, so heat loss through inside window face should be only by convection and radiation. The difference is small but I wonder what cause this difference.

(Surface Window Heat Loss Energy) is a little higher than the sum of (Window Inside Face Net Surface Thermal Radiation Heat Gain Energy) and (Window Inside Face Convection Heat Gain Energy). This is also the same for single glass window, Why?

Thank you,

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

To clarify

In energy plus example also is the same: CmplxGlz_SingleZone_DoubleClearAir.idf

If we change the output variables to hourly, when there is no solar radiation (1 am), Windows Total Heat Loss Rate is a little higher than (WINDOW:Surface Inside Face Convection Heat Gain Rate) + WINDOW:Surface Inside Face Net Surface Thermal Radiation Heat Gain Rate.

Why they are not equal?

Thank you

asro gravatar image asro  ( 2021-03-18 13:38:35 -0500 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2021-03-23 12:52:04 -0500

updated 2021-03-23 17:06:06 -0500

According to the Input Output reference, you need to request advanced output variables in order to generate output variables for all the components of window heat loss/gain output variables. This is done using the Output:Diagnostics object with the DisplayAdvancedReportVariables option (see below).

Output:Diagnostics, 
  DisplayAdvancedReportVariables;

With this object added to the IDF, you will then be able to plot the seven advanced window output variables. I've taken the same * CmplxGlz_SingleZone_DoubleClearAir.idf* example file and made these changes. When you review outputs in this kind of detail, it's best to report them on a timestep frequency instead of hourly because hourly will give you the average of all timesteps that took place over each hour.

image description

I've plotted the three output variables you were using for comparison below and can confirm that Surface Window Heat Loss Energy is NOT equal to Surface Inside Face Net Surface Thermal Radiation Heat Gain Energy + Surface Inside Face Convection Heat Gain Energy.

image description

The convection components are equal in both images, so the difference of 16.2 $W$ appears to come from the Net IR component. This could very well be because the net IR output variables for window vs. surface are for different results.

UPDATE:

See definitions below from the Input Output Reference sections for these two output variables.

Surface Inside Face Net Surface Thermal Radiation Heat Gain Energy - the heat transferred by longwave infrared thermal radiation exchanges between the inside faces of other surfaces in the zone. The values can be positive or negative with positive indicating heat is being added to the surface’s face by thermal radiation.

Surface Window Inside Face Glazing Net Infrared Heat Transfer Rate - net exchange of infrared radiation heat transfer from the glazing to the zone in watts.

From this, it looks like the surface output variable for net IR heat transfer (first output above) accounts for heat transfer between the window inside surface and all other inside surfaces of the same zone, while the advanced window output variable for net IR heat transfer rate (second output above) may account for heat transfer from window glazing to the zone's air as well. That's just my interpretation of the wording in the documentation, to confirm that this is the case you would have to consult the EnergyPlus source code to know exactly how these output variables are calculated.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Hi Aaron,

Thank you for your reply.

You wrote:

"This could very well be because the Net IR output variables for window vs. surface are for different results"

What do you mean by "different results"?

Thanks!

asro gravatar image asro  ( 2021-03-23 16:17:18 -0500 )edit

@asro I've updated my answer with more information to clarify.

Aaron Boranian gravatar image Aaron Boranian  ( 2021-03-23 17:06:22 -0500 )edit

I think your explanation is correct. In energy plus documentation when explaining the inside window heat gain/loss, just mention Net IR heat flow:

"Net IR heat flow from the zone side of the glazing"

I think it is a little confusing.

Thank you for your clarification.

asro gravatar image asro  ( 2021-03-23 19:29:36 -0500 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

 

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2021-03-18 12:06:44 -0500

Seen: 46 times

Last updated: Mar 23