Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question
4

VRF vs PTHP System

asked 2015-03-11 11:07:54 -0600

tinadarko gravatar image

updated 2015-04-13 18:18:23 -0600

Hello,

I'm trying to compare the energy use between a VRF system and a PTHP system in EnergyPlus. Both systems have a DOAS to supply outdoor air (efficiencies of the DOAS are the same, OA rates are the same), and all other parameters are the same. The VRF and PTHP system have the same rated efficiencies: cooling COP 3.3, heating COP 3.5. Capacities and supply air flow are being autosized. Both systems' fan mode is cycling. Other parameters are using the default values in OpenStudio.

I'm getting higher energy use in the VRF model, and I'm not sure what the reason is to that... any insight would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks Tina

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

1

Might be good to see end use breakdown to see where that increase is coming from. Another first step if you haven't done it is to look at the warnings in the eplusout.err for anything suspicious.

David Goldwasser gravatar imageDavid Goldwasser ( 2015-03-11 11:11:35 -0600 )edit

Thanks David, I looked in the error file and one warning I'm getting for the VRF is:

Warning ** AirConditioner:VariableRefrigerantFlow "VRF SYSTEM" -- Exceeded VRF Heat Recovery min/max outdoor temperature limit error. VRF Heat Pump Min/Max Outdoor Temperature in Heat Recovery Mode Limits have been exceeded and VRF heat recovery is disabled.

I've tried expanding the range of the min/max outdoor temperature for the heat recovery mode but I'm still getting this error.

I'm having an increase of energy mainly in heating, a little bit in cooling and some in fan energy.

tinadarko gravatar imagetinadarko ( 2015-03-11 19:12:26 -0600 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2015-03-11 11:17:59 -0600

scottb gravatar image

Do you have the same unmet hours in both cases?

Check your HTML output for 'Time Setpoint Not Met During Occupied Heating' and 'Time Setpoint Not Met During Occupied Cooling'

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thanks Scott, I checked the unmet hours for both cases and they are more or less the same:

22 hours in heating, 150 hours in cooling for PTHP; 25 hours in heating, 167 hours in cooling for VRF.

tinadarko gravatar imagetinadarko ( 2015-03-11 19:14:32 -0600 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

 

Question Tools

3 followers

Stats

Asked: 2015-03-11 11:07:54 -0600

Seen: 390 times

Last updated: Mar 11 '15