First time here? Check out the Help page!

Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question
5

Why a negative zone volume?

asked 7 years ago

maddog56's avatar

updated 7 years ago

I have this very symmetrical building and EnergyPlus warnings as follows,

* Warning * Indicated Zone Volume <= 0.0 for Zone=THERMAL ZONE: 1ST FLOOR A * ~~~ * The calculated Zone Volume was=-188.78 * ~~~ * The simulation will continue with the Zone Volume set to 10.0 m3.

* Warning * Indicated Zone Volume <= 0.0 for Zone=THERMAL ZONE: 2ND FLOOR A * ~~~ * The calculated Zone Volume was=-188.78 * ~~~ * The simulation will continue with the Zone Volume set to 10.0 m3.

I can set the zone ceiling height to what I know it to be and the warnings go away. Leaving on auto calculate and I get negative volumes. Not a show stopper but just very curious as to what might be at play here.

image description

Preview: (hide)

Comments

1

woah that's super weird. There is an OpenStudio script in SketchUp that resets origins - try running that and see if you still get the error. Maybe also try deleting the zone floor and ceiling and then redrawing them. You shouldn't be getting negative zone volumes. In earlier versions of EPlus, this would have thrown an error - see this issue on Github.

mdahlhausen's avatar mdahlhausen  ( 7 years ago )

Is there a way to check that the faces are being exported properly & that they are oriented correctly? If the faces are reversed in Sketchup, when the plugin writes the IDF file, it could be essentially pointing the faces the wrong way and resulting in an incorrect volume calculation you could check this my checking what the cardinal orientation of the faces are in the EnergyPlus output tables.

kwalkerman's avatar kwalkerman  ( 7 years ago )

Is this in EnergyPlus 8.8.0?

JasonGlazer's avatar JasonGlazer  ( 7 years ago )

Re @kwalkerman's comment, look specifically at the inside walls for zone 1a and 2a. Noticed they didn't match properly. That could mean they are just not aligned, or could mean one is reversed from expected face normal.

David Goldwasser's avatar David Goldwasser  ( 7 years ago )

EnergyPlus 8.8 changed the zone volume calcs. From my initial experience, it seems like this new code catches more bad geometries, but can fail on complex geometries and it is difficult to understand why. In this particular case, it looks like you've found the issue.

aparker's avatar aparker  ( 7 years ago )

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
6

answered 7 years ago

updated 7 years ago

For the particular file provided by maddog56, it turned out the some of the surface coordinate were entered in clockwise order instead of counter clockwise order as specified in there GlobalGeometryRules object. But no warning messages were issued to help provide guidance on the issue. To help users in the future, issue 6392 was added.

Preview: (hide)
link

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Training Workshops

Careers

Question Tools

2 followers

Stats

Asked: 7 years ago

Seen: 974 times

Last updated: Nov 14 '17