Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question
2

[E+, BCVTB] How to input dynamic data (for time t+1) into E+ that depends on the output variable (at time t)

asked 2017-09-18 05:26:03 -0500

cs_bot's avatar

updated 2017-09-22 11:07:38 -0500

I am new to the field. so please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Say I have to simulate a model that has the requirement of getting dynamic inputs (after some pre-processing) My typical flow is:

At time t: After the output variables are generated, write them onto a file.

Retrieve data from the file, and based on this, generate parameters dynamically for the next timestep. Now write this onto a file

At time t+1: The newly generated parameters is used as input to E+ for the next time step.

... and so on.

Is this above design feasible in EnergyPlus? If yes, a detailed explanation will be hugely appreciated.


Note: The crux of the query is whether control can be transferred from E+ to external programs (say for each minute of simulation) to fetch the inputs for the next timestep (which also happens to depend on the previous timestep's output)

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
3

answered 2017-09-22 10:24:59 -0500

You could implement such a processing if you use the ExternalInterface and then do the control either in a Functional Mockup Unit, or in the BCVTB.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Can you please elaborate on the 'how' part? I am using timestep t's output of EnergyPlus, feeding it to another program (written in c++, say), and getting the output of that program to be fed as (t+1)th time input to E+. (with files preferably as the intermediate)

cs_bot's avatar cs_bot  ( 2017-09-29 01:37:22 -0500 )edit

See http://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/fmu... and the examples in http://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/fmu... Once you have E+ exported as an FMU, you can import it as an input/output block in a variety of free programmable environments that support FMI 1.0 for co-simulation, such as the BCVTB, Dymola, OpenModelica, PyFMI, Simulink etc.

Michael Wetter's avatar Michael Wetter  ( 2017-10-03 22:51:42 -0500 )edit

E+ exported AS an FMU or FOR it? Also, which object variable should I be tweaking to attain this? Schedule, EMS variable or EMS actuator?

cs_bot's avatar cs_bot  ( 2017-10-17 01:59:15 -0500 )edit

Dear Michael, Is it fair to say that another alternative is to use SystemCommand (under Actors -> Simulator, (authored by you)) in BCVTB to call C programs to further call other C/C++ functions if necessary (for a very C-specific implementation along with E+ and BCVTB)?

cs_bot's avatar cs_bot  ( 2017-10-24 02:01:10 -0500 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Careers

Question Tools

2 followers

Stats

Asked: 2017-09-18 05:26:03 -0500

Seen: 266 times

Last updated: Sep 22 '17