There are few clues about this severe error on UnmetHours. Although this is a very old question, I add another possible cause for those who have the same problem.
When we get this severe error, we may find the following message at the end of the err file.
************* ===== Final Error Summary =====
************* The following error categories occurred. Consider correcting or noting.
************* Temperature (low) out of bounds
************* ..A temperature out of bounds problem can be caused by several things. The user should check:
************* ..1) the weather environment (including the horizontal IR from sky)
************* ..2) the level of interal gains with respect to the zone
************* ..3) the thermal properties of their materials. And other things.
************* ..A common cause is a building with no or little thermal mass - all materials with Material:NoMass definitions.
In my case, this was exactly the cause. I used Material:NoMass
for all walls/roofs/floors/ceilings, and the zones with the severe error had large windows.
EngineeringReference gives us a clue as to why this is the case.
"There are potential issues with having a resistance-only layer at either the inner or outer most layers of a construction. A little or no mass layer there could receive intense thermal radiation from internal sources or the sun causing the temperature at the inner or outer surface to achieve very high levels."
However, sometimes we need to use Material:NoMass
especially for ASHRAE90.1 Baseline case where the U-value is specified. There are two options to avoid the severe surface temperature error.
- Create the interior walls/ceilings/floors with multi-layer
Material
objects rather than Material:NoMass
objects. - Add
InternalMas
For the option 2, there is no standard for how much InternalMass
should be added. I often refer to DOE's Prototype Building Models. They have InternalMass
objects to account for interior furnishings.
Material,
Std Wood 6inch, !- Name
MediumSmooth, !- Roughness
0.15, !- Thickness {m}
0.12, !- Conductivity {W/m-K}
540.0000, !- Density {kg/m3}
1210, !- Specific Heat {J/kg-K}
0.9000000, !- Thermal Absorptance
0.7000000, !- Solar Absorptance
0.7000000; !- Visible Absorptance
Construction,
InteriorFurnishings, !- Name
Std Wood 6inch; !- Outside Layer
InternalMass,
Perimeter_bot_ZN_3_InternalMass_1, !- Name
InteriorFurnishings, !- Construction Name
Perimeter_bot_ZN_3, !- Zone or ZoneList Name
, !- Space or SpaceList Name
626.8258; !- Surface Area {m2}
In the Prototype Building Models, InternalMass
objects are added to all conditioned zones, and the each Surface Area on InternalMass
is set at twice the floor area of each zone regardless of the building type such as office, retail, residential, etc.
Hello @mgleason05. Welcome to UnmetHours. To help route the question to the right people, please tag with the software you are using.
My apologies! I am currently using EnergyPlus v8.3
I had this problem, and I solved it by correcting the big amount of receptacle load assigned to the space containing the surface.
Hi, there. I just have the same problem when I using the grasshopper_honeybee tool interface, the result of surfaces shows high out of bounds or low out of bounds .I can tell from your solve way , but seems that I couldn't find the counterpart setting in HB tool , Does anyone know how to figure it out? Thanks in advance!