Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question
1

Operative Temperature Plateaus Around 36°C Despite No Cooling or Ventilation

asked 2025-07-03 05:30:20 -0500

Sama's avatar

updated 2025-07-04 03:32:50 -0500

I'm running overheating simulations in EnergyPlus for a residential building in a hot climate (Damascus, Syria). Even under RCP 8.5 and extreme heatwave conditions (+8°C), the operative temperature never exceeds ~36°C. There is no mechanical cooling or active ventilation in the model.

Is this a known limitation in EnergyPlus? Has anyone experienced this or know how to verify the cause?

here's a link to the idf: https://tubcloud.tu-berlin.de/s/KrRNB...

Thanks!

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

@Sama can you upload your model to Google Drive, Dropbox, etc. and then share a URL for others to download? That would help others provide better solutions.

Aaron Boranian's avatar Aaron Boranian  ( 2025-07-03 10:31:17 -0500 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
2

answered 2025-07-04 06:35:51 -0500

updated 2025-07-07 10:20:37 -0500

Summary of your model:

  • single zone (6m x 8m x 2.7m)
  • no windows, no doors
  • 4x walls & 1x roof : 200mm concrete + 50mm EPS ... ~R10
  • 1x slab-on-grade : 200mm + finish - no insulation
  • no cooling, no ventilation, no infiltration

I can pretty much reproduce your results (max 34°C ... not 36°C) - I suspect I'm not using the same Damascus weather file. Yet overall, there's very little wrong with your model.

What is likely happening is that the (uninsulated) slab+ground combo is continuously acting as a heat sink, lowering zone air (and wall+roof interior surface) temperatures. Peruse through hourly surface temperatures in the eplusout.eso file: the floor interior surface temperatures are 3 to 4°C cooler than the other surface temperatures in summer.

I altered your model by adding the same 50mm EPS insulation in the floor construction (cancelling the slab+ground heat sink effect). The floor interior surface temperatures are now only slightly below the other temperatures (e.g. -0.5°C). Yet ALL temperatures are now 7 to 8°C warmer (in summer) than the original uninsulated scenario. This can also be accomplished by setting the floor outside boundary conditions to "adiabatic". Adding day ventilation + infiltration will make things worse. Adding a west-facing window will raise temperatures well into the 40°C, I suspect.


Side note: Check the eplusout.err file warnings for both the "people" and "equipment" definitions/schedules (see here), which I changed:

People,
    ZONE ONE People,         !- Name
    GF,                      !- Zone or ZoneList or Space or SpaceList Name
    ALWAYS 1,                !- Number of People Schedule Name
    People,                  !- Number of People Calculation Method
    4,                       !- Number of People
    ,                        !- People per Floor Area {person/m2}
    ,                        !- Floor Area per Person {m2/person}
    0.3,                     !- Fraction Radiant
    0.3,                     !- Sensible Heat Fraction
    ActivitySchedule;        !- Activity Level Schedule Name

ElectricEquipment,
    ZONE ONE Equipment,      !- Name
    GF,                      !- Zone or ZoneList or Space or SpaceList Name
    ALWAYS 1,                !- Schedule Name
    EquipmentLevel,          !- Design Level Calculation Method
    400,                     !- Design Level {W}
    ,                        !- Watts per Zone Floor Area {W/m2}
    ,                        !- Watts per Person {W/person}
    0.3,                     !- Fraction Latent
    0.6,                     !- Fraction Radiant
    0.1;                     !- Fraction Lost

Schedule:Compact,
    ALWAYS 1,                !- Name
    Any Number,              !- Schedule Type Limits Name
    Through: 12/31,          !- Field 1
    For: AllDays,            !- Field 2
    Until: 24:00,            !- Field 3
    1;                       !- Field 4

Schedule:Compact,
    ActivitySchedule,        !- Name
    ActivityLevelX,          !- Schedule Type Limits Name
    Through: 12/31,          !- Field 1
    For: AllDays,            !- Field 2
    Until: 24:00,            !- Field 3
    100;                     !- Field 4

ScheduleTypeLimits,
    ActivityLevelX,          !- Name
    70,                      !- Lower Limit Value
    200,                     !- Upper Limit Value
    continuous,              !- Numeric Type
    activitylevel;           !- Unit Type

Note the activity levels (e.g. min 70 W/person) ...


edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Thank you for answering, I have also modified the window material properties in the IDF file by:

  • Increasing the Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) to allow more radiation into the space.

  • Increasing the visible transmittance, which also contributes to internal heat gain.

These changes made the indoor thermal response more realistic, rising the temperature indoor by 7-8 degrees.

I will also modify it according to your suggestion and see what results are closer to reality. Thank you!

Sama's avatar Sama  ( 2025-07-09 03:38:48 -0500 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Training Workshops

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2025-07-03 05:30:20 -0500

Seen: 70 times

Last updated: Jul 07