Why does increasing air gap in double glazing increase cooling energy in my DesignBuilder model?
I'm simulating a residential building in DesignBuilder (EnergyPlus engine) for a warm-humid Indian climate, and analyzing the impact of double glazing with varying air gaps. I created four custom window types (3mm glass + air gap + 3mm glass), varying only the air gap (6mm, 8mm, 10mm, 12mm). The U-value reduces as expected (from 3.15 to 2.73 W/m²K) and SHGC is constant (~0.76), but the cooling load increases with larger air gaps, which contradicts theoretical expectations.
Key model details:
Only one zone (bedroom) is cooled using a PTAC-type system (PTHP cooling only).
No ventilation is active: all natural ventilation is disabled, infiltration is set to 0.0, and mechanical ventilation is off.
AC schedule is fixed across all cases.
Glazing variants are properly assigned to the same west-facing window.
All other parameters (geometry, loads, envelope) remain unchanged.
Despite this, results consistently show higher cooling load as U-value improves. Has anyone else observed this counterintuitive result? Is it a simulation quirk, or am I missing something subtle in the model setup?