Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question
1

Why does increasing air gap in double glazing increase cooling energy in my DesignBuilder model?

asked 2025-06-27 09:57:23 -0500

updated 2025-06-27 14:39:50 -0500

I'm simulating a residential building in DesignBuilder (EnergyPlus engine) for a warm-humid Indian climate, and analyzing the impact of double glazing with varying air gaps. I created four custom window types (3mm glass + air gap + 3mm glass), varying only the air gap (6mm, 8mm, 10mm, 12mm). The U-value reduces as expected (from 3.15 to 2.73 W/m²K) and SHGC is constant (~0.76), but the cooling load increases with larger air gaps, which contradicts theoretical expectations.

Key model details:

Only one zone (bedroom) is cooled using a PTAC-type system (PTHP cooling only).

No ventilation is active: all natural ventilation is disabled, infiltration is set to 0.0, and mechanical ventilation is off.

AC schedule is fixed across all cases.

Glazing variants are properly assigned to the same west-facing window.

All other parameters (geometry, loads, envelope) remain unchanged.

Despite this, results consistently show higher cooling load as U-value improves. Has anyone else observed this counterintuitive result? Is it a simulation quirk, or am I missing something subtle in the model setup?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
1

answered 2025-06-28 14:56:34 -0500

updated 2025-06-28 14:58:56 -0500

Not a definitive answer ...

West-facing spaces are typically more problematic (than other orientations) when it comes to solar/overheating. It is not unusual to see west-facing fenestration SHGC specs below 30% - not up to 76%. Of course context matters (e.g. fenestration area, internal loads, regional practices), but cutting down solar loads (e.g. revised SHGC, exterior shading) may have an order of magnitude more impact on cooling loads than improvements in fenestration U-factors. I understand this is not what you're after, but I think it's worth underlining.

I suggest you go over comments/answers to related UMH posts (here, here & here). What you may be coming up against is hindered radiative cooling from building envelope U-factor improvements. One way of looking at this: improvements in fenestration U-factor == improved greenhouse, yet with a thwarted capacity to free-cool itself (when conditions are suitable). This can be observed even in cold climates, with overheating solutions ranging from natural or mechanical free-cooling (e.g. economizers) to mechanical heat transfer elsewhere in the building.

I suggest you dive deeper to track when increased mechanical cooling is occurring over the year. For instance, is the increase occurring at night and/or during shoulder seasons? This should provide some insight.

Hope this helps.


edit flag offensive delete link more

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Training Workshops

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2025-06-27 09:57:23 -0500

Seen: 115 times

Last updated: Jun 28