Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
 | 1 | initial version |
I think you would want to report at "RunPeriod" frequency to get the same numbers out. Or sum up all the hourly values.
Fanger PMV values are a bit more useful, in my opinion. But, of course, many feel it is all about Unmet Hours.
If you want to reduce the ASHRAE 55 hours, you will want to tighten up the thermostat range which will help drag the surface temperatures into the acceptable range.
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
I think That whole-building report is looking across all the zones in the building, so to match it you would want have to report compare those outputs looking at "RunPeriod" frequency to get the same numbers out. Or sum up all the hourly values. zones.
Fanger PMV values are a bit more useful, in my opinion. But, of course, many feel it is all about Unmet Hours.
If you want to reduce the ASHRAE 55 hours, you will want to tighten up the thermostat range which will help drag the surface temperatures into the acceptable range.
