Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

I am going to grumble a little here even if they are making a release:

I think they are possibly trying to get out of the software business and trying to deprecate an excellent piece of free software that serves many users and is turning out to be the only simply installed and used free energy software around! What started out as a great govt sponsored effort to nail down energy use with lots of software efforts, is slowly devolving into a less useful software. I really hope this is not right!

Instead I would like to see 1. Improvements and more flexibility in creating models of new and existing buildings.(the interface is very good now compared to when it started) 2. Perhaps the ability to import wireframe or sketchup models. 3. Continued support and improvement of EnergyPlus. 4. Better CCHP support with sizing, efficiency, multiple heat pumps, multi-heads (with types) VRV, etc.

I am going to grumble a little here even if they are making a release:

I think they are possibly trying to get out of the software business and trying to deprecate an excellent piece of free software that serves many users and is turning out to be the only simply installed and used free energy software around! What started out as a great govt sponsored effort to nail down energy use with lots of software efforts, is slowly devolving into a less useful software. I really hope this is not right!

Instead I would like to see 1. Improvements and more flexibility in creating models of new and existing buildings.(the interface is very good now compared to when it started) 2. Perhaps the ability to import wireframe or sketchup models. 3. Continued support and improvement of EnergyPlus. 4. Better CCHP support with sizing, efficiency, multiple heat pumps, multi-heads (with types) VRV, etc.

  1. More funding for development of this software. It is the best way to get people aware of what they are really doing to the environment and how they can change their approach.

I am going to grumble a little here even if they are making a release:

I think they are possibly trying to get out of the software business and trying to deprecate an excellent piece of free software that serves many users and is turning out to be the only simply installed and used free energy software around! What started out as a great govt sponsored effort to nail down energy use with lots of software efforts, is slowly devolving into a less useful software. I really hope this is not right!

Instead I would like to see 1.

  1. Improvements and more flexibility in creating models of new and existing buildings.(the interface is very good now compared to when it started) 2. started) but it need much more improvement.

  2. Perhaps the ability to import wireframe or sketchup models. 3. models.

  3. Continued support and improvement of EnergyPlus. 4. EnergyPlus.

  4. Better CCHP support with sizing, efficiency, multiple heat pumps, multi-heads (with types) VRV, etc.

    1. More funding for development of this software. It is the best way to get people aware of what they are really doing to the environment and how they can change their approach.

I am going to grumble a little here even if they are making a release:

I think they are possibly trying to get out of the software business and trying to deprecate an excellent piece of free software that serves many users and is turning out to be the only simply installed and used free energy software around! What started out as a great govt sponsored effort to nail down energy use with lots of software efforts, is slowly devolving into a less useful software. I really hope this is not right!

Instead I would like to see

  1. Improvements and more flexibility in creating models of new and existing buildings.(the interface is very good now compared to when it started) but it need much more improvement.

  2. Perhaps the ability to import wireframe or sketchup models.

  3. Continued support and improvement of EnergyPlus.

  4. Better CCHP support with sizing, efficiency, multiple heat pumps, multi-heads (with types) VRV, etc.

  5. More funding for development of this software. It is the best way to get people aware of what they are really doing to the environment and how they can change their approach.

PS we lost the EnergyPlus Opensource Sketchup advantages to google's purchase by Trimble, so that now it is a paid subscription for the frontend. What a loss.

BEopt is the only software now available for free that uses EnergyPlus. It's development should be fully supported and developed by the Energy Department.