First time here? Check out the Help page!
2024-01-17 13:50:43 -0500 | asked a question | BEopt v3 Battery Hourly Output BEopt v3 Battery Hourly Output Hello, I want to confirm that the DVIEW output for a model that includes batteries on th |
2023-12-12 07:02:38 -0500 | edited answer | Understanding Beopt Economic Analysis The built-in help provides extensive details on this; at least it does in v2.8 Roughly-speaking, present value is what |
2023-12-12 07:01:36 -0500 | edited answer | Understanding Beopt Economic Analysis The built-in help provides extensive details on this; at least it does in v2.8 Roughly-speaking, present value is what |
2023-12-12 06:59:24 -0500 | answered a question | Understanding Beopt Economic Analysis The built-in help is quite detailed no this; at least it is in v2.8 Present value is what you could sell the home for a |
2023-10-23 09:08:01 -0500 | commented answer | beopt for residential code compliance - baseline/benchmark Such canned approaches only work in limited cases anyhow, since so many jurisdictions amend the IECC reference code. Mak |
2023-10-23 09:00:04 -0500 | commented answer | beopt for residential code compliance - baseline/benchmark Such canned approaches only work in limited cases anyhow, since so many jurisdictions amend the IECC reference code. Mak |
2023-10-23 08:58:22 -0500 | commented answer | beopt for residential code compliance - baseline/benchmark Such canned approaches only work in limited cases anyhow, since so many jurisdictions amend the IECC reference code. Mak |
2023-08-02 12:19:52 -0500 | commented answer | BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay Thank you for the response. To clarify my original query about the interplay for future readers: Source:Site = (Delive |
2023-08-02 06:42:23 -0500 | commented answer | BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay Thank you for the response. To clarify my original query about the interplay for future readers: Source:Site = (Delive |
2023-08-02 06:41:50 -0500 | commented answer | BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay Thank you for the response. To clarify my original query about the interplay for future readers: Source:Site = (Delive |
2023-08-01 07:55:54 -0500 | commented answer | BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay Thank you for the response. To clarify my original query about the interplay for future readers: Source:Site = (Deliver |
2023-07-31 13:38:41 -0500 | edited question | BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay How exactly are these used when calculating emissions, spec |
2023-07-31 12:55:18 -0500 | edited question | BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay How exactly are these used when calculating emissions, spec |
2023-07-31 12:54:56 -0500 | edited question | BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay How exactly are these used when calculating emissions, spec |
2023-07-31 12:54:06 -0500 | asked a question | BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay BEopt Gas carbon factor & source to site ratio interplay How exactly are these used when calculating emissions, spec |
2023-07-08 09:23:31 -0500 | asked a question | Numbered results in DView when using BEopt v2.8 wit ERI enabled. Numbered results in DView when using BEopt v2.8 wit ERI enabled. If I run a model in BEopt v2.8 with the ERI and DView b |
2023-06-29 07:58:34 -0500 | commented answer | BEopt ground source loop type: Open or closed? Great. Still no desuperheater I see, although one can roughly fake it by artificially inflating the efficiency and cost |
2023-06-29 07:56:21 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2023-06-28 10:42:25 -0500 | edited question | BEopt ground source loop type: Open or closed? BEopt ground source loop type: Open or closed? BEopt's help specifies that GSHP are modeled as vertical bores rather tha |
2023-06-28 10:41:38 -0500 | edited question | BEopt ground source loop type: Open or closed? BEopt ground source loop type BEopt's help specifies that GSHP are modeled as vertical bores rather than horizontal fiel |
2023-06-28 10:39:57 -0500 | asked a question | BEopt ground source loop type: Open or closed? BEopt ground source loop type BEopt's help specifies that GSHP are modeled as vertical bores rather than horizontal fiel |
2023-06-23 06:34:19 -0500 | edited answer | How can I test different solar solutions in BEopt? See Tools > Options manager. Note that the default costs are national averages circa 2018. You cannot edit the defaul |
2023-06-23 06:32:38 -0500 | received badge | ● Rapid Responder (source) |
2023-06-23 06:32:38 -0500 | answered a question | How can I test different solar solutions in BEopt? See Tools > Options manager. Note that the default costs are national averages circa 2018. You cannot edit the defaul |
2023-05-22 10:54:08 -0500 | edited question | CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? Is it possible to add native support for a preconditioning (CERV)/air treatment unit(ATU)/ventila |
2023-05-22 10:15:45 -0500 | edited question | CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? Is it possible to add native support for a preconditioning (CERV)/air treatment unit(ATU)/ventila |
2023-05-22 10:03:24 -0500 | edited question | CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? Is it possible to add native support for a preconditioning (CERV)/air treatment unit(ATU)/ventila |
2023-05-22 09:57:09 -0500 | edited question | CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? Is it possible to add native support for a preconditioning (CERV)/air treatment unit(ATU)/ventila |
2023-05-22 09:33:58 -0500 | edited question | CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? Is it possible to add native support for a preconditioning (CERV)/air treatment unit(ATU)/ventila |
2023-05-22 09:33:09 -0500 | asked a question | CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? CERV/ATU/VHP in BEopt? Is it possible to add native support for a preconditioning (CERV)/air treatment unit(ATU)/ventila |
2023-05-09 07:07:40 -0500 | edited question | BEopt v3 MF modelling? BEopt v3 MF modelling? There's a line on the BEopt web page describing the removal of modelling multifamily buildings as |
2023-04-18 11:33:13 -0500 | commented question | BEopt v3 MF modelling? @muhl Adiabatic means "same temperature," so one large unconditioned attic is the same as an unconditioned attic next to |
2023-04-18 11:32:06 -0500 | commented question | BEopt v3 MF modelling? @muhl Adiabatic means same temperature, so one large unconditioned attic is the same as an unconditioned attic next to a |
2023-04-05 07:51:47 -0500 | edited question | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? It seems BEopt (v2.8) has an egregious bug in the reported costs for mini-sp |
2023-04-05 07:51:07 -0500 | edited question | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? It seems BEopt (v2.8) has an egregious bug in the reported costs for mini-sp |
2023-04-05 07:50:32 -0500 | commented answer | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? The correct multipliers are used for the Cost ($/unit; fixed labor cost, unit=# MSHPs) and Cost ($/kbTUh, variable mater |
2023-04-04 16:29:26 -0500 | edited question | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? It seems BEopt (v2.8) has an egregious bug in the reported costs for mini-sp |
2023-04-04 16:28:20 -0500 | edited question | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? It seems BEopt (v2.8) has an egregious bug in the reported costs for mini-sp |
2023-04-04 16:28:07 -0500 | edited question | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? It seems BEopt (v2.8) has an egregious bug in the reported costs for mini-sp |
2023-04-04 16:26:10 -0500 | commented answer | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? See amendment to question for image clarification. |
2023-04-04 16:25:46 -0500 | edited question | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? It seems BEopt (v2.8) has an egregious bug in the reported costs for mini-sp |
2023-04-04 16:15:26 -0500 | commented answer | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? The correct multipliers are used for the Cost ($/unit; fixed labor cost, unit=# MSHPs) and Cost ($/kbTUh, variable mater |
2023-04-04 16:10:53 -0500 | commented answer | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? The correct multipliers are used for the Cost ($/unit; fixed labor cost, unit=# MSHPs) and Cost ($/kbTUh, variable mater |
2023-04-04 16:10:14 -0500 | commented answer | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? The correct multipliers are used for the Cost ($/unit; fixed labor cost, unit=# MSHPs) and Cost ($/kbTUh, variable mater |
2023-04-04 16:09:58 -0500 | commented answer | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? The correct multipliers are used for the Cost ($/unit; fixed labor cost, unit=# MSHPs) and Cost ($/kbTUh, variable mater |
2023-04-04 16:09:39 -0500 | commented answer | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? The correct multipliers are used for the Cost ($/unit; fixed labor cost, unit=# MSHPs) and Cost ($/kbTUh, variable mater |
2023-04-04 16:08:54 -0500 | commented answer | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? The correct multipliers are used for the Cost ($/unit; fixed labor cost, unit=# MSHPs) and Cost ($/kbTUh, variable mater |
2023-04-04 14:38:44 -0500 | edited question | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? It seems BEopt (v2.8) has an egregious bug in the reported costs for mini-sp |
2023-04-04 14:36:34 -0500 | edited question | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? It seems BEopt (v2.8) has an egregious bug in the reported costs for mini-sp |
2023-04-04 14:30:28 -0500 | asked a question | MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? MF MSHP Cost bug in BEopt, scope of impact? It seems BEopt (v2.8) has an egregious bug in the reported costs for mini-sp |