First time here? Check out the Help page!
2022-06-07 18:10:15 -0500 | received badge | ● Notable Question (source) |
2022-04-08 21:13:57 -0500 | received badge | ● Popular Question (source) |
2020-12-19 09:19:28 -0500 | received badge | ● Enthusiast |
2020-11-26 14:24:51 -0500 | asked a question | Why the AvailabilityManager:NightVentilation can not change the fan operation mode Why the AvailabilityManager:NightVentilation can not change the fan operation mode I want to use ZonePackaged: HeatPump |
2020-10-01 15:35:26 -0500 | commented question | How EnergyPlus calculates Richardson number for zone flow regime @Aaron Boranian.Yes, Thank you! CHTC is short for convective heat transfer coefficient. What I want to investigate is ho |
2020-09-23 09:15:21 -0500 | commented question | How EnergyPlus calculates Richardson number for zone flow regime Yes, Thank you! CHTC is short for convective heat transfer coefficient. What I want to investigate is how does EnergyPlu |
2020-09-22 04:59:23 -0500 | asked a question | How EnergyPlus calculates Richardson number for zone flow regime How EnergyPlus calculates Richardson number for zone flow regime According to the Engineering reference of EnergyPlus, i |
2020-04-22 13:07:09 -0500 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2020-04-22 04:30:22 -0500 | answered a question | E+ and simulink - BCVTB error Try EnergyPlus Co-simulation Toolbox, it would be easier than BCVTB. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchang |
2019-05-16 13:58:09 -0500 | edited question | MPC for EnergyPlus MPC for EnergyPlus Does anyone who knows how to use SimCon with GenOpt to equip the MPC (model predictive control) into |
2019-05-16 13:58:09 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2019-05-16 13:54:20 -0500 | asked a question | MPC for EnergyPlus MPC for EnergyPlus Does anyone who knows how to use SimCon coupled with GenOpt to equip the MPC (model predictive contro |
2018-08-24 15:24:35 -0500 | commented answer | PMV output is too low Hi Witte, Thank you very much for your kind help. I made a mistake, the value of 0.5 is the clo insulation in summer. I |
2018-08-24 15:19:14 -0500 | marked best answer | PMV output is too low I run my case to get the thermal comfort results with Fanger, AdaptiveASH55 and AdaptiveCEN15251 model respectively. The zone has air conditioning, operating from 8:00-17:00, with set point 24.5℃. The input for internal heat gains: People can see as below: which People activity is always 70, WORK_EFF_SCH is 1, WORK_EFF_SCH is 0.5, and AIR_VELO_SCH is 0.2. But when I get the results of 1.Zone Thermal Comfort Fanger Model PMV 2.Zone Thermal Comfort Fanger Model PPD 3.Zone Thermal Comfort CEN 15251 Adaptive Model Category I Status 4.Zone Thermal Comfort ASHRAE 55 Simple Model Summer Clothes Not Comfortable Time I found that the during occupied hours the PMV is about -7 and PPD is 100%, which means the it is too cold in Fanger model. However the later two results 3 and 4 are almost 1 and 0 respectively, which means that it is comfortable when the Air conditioning operates. |
2018-08-21 11:43:03 -0500 | marked best answer | EMS for custom output variable I am trying to set up some custom output variables, so that I can use the custom data to be analysis directly. But I checked the custom output variables by handling the original output variables, I found some problems, which are: A.When I use the original output variables to calculate 'Temperature Efficiency' and 'AC Consumption' with the same formulas in EMS program, the results does not match with the EMS custom output results, even through I change the reporting frequency from hourly to timestep. B. The AC system operates from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. For calculating the AC Consumption, the result from original output variables is smaller than the EMS result, but usually after a shorter period such as from 8:30 AM, the former result equals with the EMS result. C. I checked the example files of EMSCustomOutputVariable.idf, and set a simple EMS program to let the T1 plus T2. I found that when the output variable style is 'Zone mean air temperature', the result from original output variables equals the EMS result. But when I change the output variable style to 'Zone air temperature', the two results differ a lot. The blow is the idf scripts: (more) |
2018-08-21 11:43:03 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2018-08-21 11:43:02 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2018-08-21 05:24:20 -0500 | commented answer | EMS for custom output variable Thank you very much! It does works by your guidance. So for the "Zone Mean Air temperature", should I also change the "E |
2018-08-20 14:57:02 -0500 | asked a question | PMV output is too low PMV output is too low I run my case to get the thermal comfort results with Fanger, AdaptiveASH55 and AdaptiveCEN15251 m |
2018-08-14 16:49:57 -0500 | commented question | EMS for custom output variable Dear Aaron, Thanks a lot for your advice. I just revised my post. |
2018-08-14 16:49:31 -0500 | edited question | EMS for custom output variable EMS for custom output variable I am trying to set up some custom output variables, so that I can use the custom data to |
2018-08-14 16:44:00 -0500 | commented question | EMS for custom output variable It seems that I can not answer my own question in 2 days, because I am a new comer. I just tried to transfer the image t |
2018-08-14 16:36:23 -0500 | commented question | EMS for custom output variable Dear Aaron, Thanks a lot for your response. I added the output:variable objects for the two custom variables, so that I |
2018-08-14 14:37:25 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2018-08-14 14:27:04 -0500 | asked a question | EMS for custom output variable EMS for custom output variable I am trying to set up some custom output variables, so that I can use the custom data to |