First time here? Check out the Help page!
2020-01-21 15:15:00 -0500 | edited question | Optimal number of parallel EnergyPlus simulations on multi-core machine Optimal number of parallel EnergyPlus simulations on multi-core machine I was using Python multiprocessing and subproces |
2020-01-21 15:15:00 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2020-01-21 15:12:01 -0500 | edited question | Optimal number of parallel EnergyPlus simulations on multi-core machine Optimal number of parallel EnergyPlus simulations on multi-core machine I was using Python multiprocessing and subproces |
2020-01-21 11:00:46 -0500 | marked best answer | Optimal number of parallel EnergyPlus simulations on multi-core machine I was using Python The EnergyPlus documentation Run EnergyPlus in Parallel says "To be time efficient, the number of parallel EnergyPlus runs should not be more than the number of CPUs on a computer", but I'm not sure how it applies to multi-core CPUs, nor can I find other clear answers elsewhere. Any suggestions are more than welcome. EDIT: Following the advice from @Jason Glazer and @Julien Marrec, I did a simple test with two models, 24 runs each on another laptop with a 4-core CPU, 8 logical processors, and 32GB RAM. No other tasks were performed on the laptop during the test. Customized pre- and post-process are performed separately from parallel runs in my workflow so they won't consume CPU during the runs. Here's the results (number of processes - total time/time per EnergyPlus run): Model 1:
Model 2:
So it looks like it's OK to use maximum number of threads, but the gain is very small. Accoding to this answer on StackOverflow, it sounds like using the number of cores (optionally minus 1) is a safer bet for my workflow, especially when the number of runs reach thousands. Not sure if it is still the case for pure EnergyPlus workflow, i.e. using EP-Launch's group simulation functionality. Thank you again for your advice. |
2020-01-21 11:00:46 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2020-01-17 12:48:19 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2020-01-17 12:25:22 -0500 | asked a question | Optimal number of parallel EnergyPlus simulations on multi-core machine Optimal number of parallel EnergyPlus simulations on multi-core machine I was using Python multiprocessing and subproces |
2019-06-12 08:54:38 -0500 | answered a question | Simultaneously run a number of independent EnergyPlus simulations on multiple cores on Linux via a script. You can use Python module multiprocessing and modify the codes in Ref (2) to run on multiple cores. |
2019-02-04 13:11:17 -0500 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2019-02-04 11:48:54 -0500 | answered a question | Which Coefficient is used by Adaptive Convection Algorithm? I've never used it, but the "Surface Inside Face Convection Model Equation Index" output seems to be what you're looking |
2018-02-12 20:38:20 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2018-02-09 13:03:08 -0500 | commented answer | script for multiple simulations Is it possible to modify the above Python scripts to allow parallel/multi-core simulations? |