gsuscalo's profile - activity

Frame Conductance? When I adjust the properties of window frame/divider objects, it asks for a frame 'conductance'. Acco

overhangs- solid or louvered I'm using Openstudio 1.14. I'm wondering- when I 'add overhang by projection factor', is

Baseboard heater problem I'm currently using Openstudio 1.14. My original model was running just fine. But sometimes wh

Openstudio- failed google drive synch discards file I am currently using Openstudio 1.14 on a Windows 10 laptop. I backu

"common piping"...yes, that is the terminology I was looking for...but it sounds like it will be a pain implementing tha

primary-secondary heating I am currently using openstudio 1.14, trying to set up some HVAC details based on the document

Thanks, I think it was the flow rate of the fixtures (now @ the 'baseline' levels specified in the LEEDv4 reference), th

David, here's the settings for the water heater: Since I managed to bring the service water natural gas load down

This is at least part of the story- I just drew the fractional schedules down and got a significant change.

This is definitely at least part of it- just drew the fractional schedules down and got a significant change.

Unrealistic service water heating load Hello all, I'm currently using Openstudio 1.14 on a windows 10 computer. I'm ha

Demand Controlled Ventilation- how the measure works? Hello all, I am currently using Openstudio 1.14 on my windows 10

Well that was fortunately easy. Thanks.

Simple glazing system unavailable How exactly to I make the simple glazing system objects appear in Openstudio. I'm usin

Yeah...it turns out I wasn't seeing it in the "apply measure now" list...obviously not, since it's the kind of measure t

ASHRAE 189.1-2009 and Default constructions Hello all, I'm currently working on modeling fenestration for a building t

Do you happen to know what the solution to this issue was? I noticed way-too-large natural gas loads when I followed the

Hello all,

[currently using OS 1.14 on a Windows 10 computer]

I have a question about using the radiance daylighting capability measure, because I'm seeing some contradictory info about it online. On forum responses, it's stated that there's two daylighting controls. But when I run my OS model with the radiance measure, it sends a message saying that the 'secondary' daylighting control will be ignored, and I see this repeated in the instructions online (https://nrel.github.io/OpenStudio-use...). My question is- are the secondary daylighting controls in fact ignored in the current version of OS/radiance I use (I have whichever radiance gets automatically installed w/ OS 1.14), and are they included/used in any newer versions of Openstudio?

-Gabe

Thanks. I think I have a decent idea of what my options are now.

Cannot find unmet load hours measure Hello all, I am currently using Openstudio 1.14 on a Windows computer. I've been

So to be sure I understand this correctly (from your response and some other threads): -If I use the radiance measure,

Secondary Daylight control ignored Hello all, [currently using OS 1.14 on a Windows 10 computer] I have a question ab

Unnecessary surface subdivision Hello all, I am currently working on modeling a 2-story commercial building with Opens

Openstudio - Can't find air wall option I'm currently modeling a building in Openstudio 1.14, trying to change some wall

Yeah I just started hiding the surrounding spaces individually. Thanks

Not to say 'me too', but me too! I am repeatedly running into similar problems with this in Openstudio 1.10. After I run

Openstudio hide rest of model but still make CAD outline visible Hello All, I am currently working on drawing the buil

Macumber, in a similar case of my Sketchup apparently not being able to find the openstudio package that I installed, I had a C:\ProgramData\SketchUp\SketchUp 2016\SketchUp directory, with a 'plugins' folder in it, but for some reason I still needed to do that copying trick you described above to make Sketchup actually load with the Openstudio plugin. All seems well now...should I assume that the workflow will now function correctly?