First time here? Check out the Help page!
2020-05-13 12:42:13 -0500 | commented answer | Graphical Interface for the building geometry in EnergyPlus Thank you for your quick response. For what I have been reading here, FloorSpace JS cannot convert this JSON file into a |
2020-05-13 10:07:50 -0500 | asked a question | Graphical Interface for the building geometry in EnergyPlus Graphical Interface for the building geometry in EnergyPlus Hi everyone, I am currently working on the development of a |
2016-06-20 13:10:01 -0500 | commented question | SurfaceControl: Movable Insulation vs Construction Properties @ EnergyPlus I am using "Material" for the Construction and for the MovableInsulation Classlist |
2016-06-20 11:03:19 -0500 | received badge | ● Editor (source) |
2016-06-20 11:02:18 -0500 | asked a question | SurfaceControl: Movable Insulation vs Construction Properties @ EnergyPlus Hi everyone. I am trying to assess the performance of dynamic insulation materials, and to do so I am now using the class list SurfaceControl:MovableInsulation. In this class list, we can add or remove a certain layer of material, on the inside and/or outside of a specific opaque surface. To do so, you have to define a fractional schedule (between 0.0-1.0) that represents a fractional modifier on the thermal resistance of the material layer that you're studying (which allows to change its thermal conductivity) In order to establish a starting point (reference) to the analysis that I have been doing, I started with the case where the insulation layer is set ON. To do so, I thought it would be the same to set the material as a layer on the Construction Class List or to set it Always ON on the SurfaceControl:MovableInsulation Class List. But when I calculated the heating and cooling demand, the values were a bit different:
Does anyone knows the reason for that? Thank you in advance! |
2016-05-01 09:58:17 -0500 | commented answer | Errors using EMS on E+ to simulate dynamic insulation 3 - Finally, I broke the insulation layer on WALLS_HIGHCOND surface in two layers (each one of 5 cm).. and once more it failed to equal the number of nodes. Then I remember that from the literature review I did regarding these temperature nodes on CondFD, I saw that they also depend on the timestep of the simulation. So after having two layers, as you proposed, I tried changing the number of timesteps from 60 to 30 => Problem Solved (No Errors) |
2016-05-01 09:57:57 -0500 | commented answer | Errors using EMS on E+ to simulate dynamic insulation Thank you for the input @Archmage. 1 - I need to use CondFD because I need to use the temperatures inside the construction (CTF only assesses the heat balance regarding the outside and inside surface of the wall). This way I can plot the profile of the temperatures inside the wall. 2 - Moreover, I tried different combinations of the parameters in the HeatBalanceSettings:ConductionFiniteDifference object, but it always failed to equal the number of nodes in both surfaces. The thing is that I do not know what is the adequate criteria to define the changes on those parameters. |
2016-05-01 09:56:19 -0500 | commented answer | Errors using EMS on E+ to simulate dynamic insulation Thank you @MatthewSteen for the comment. It's kinda of an answer because the problem was solved after changing another parameter. But I will change it anyway. |
2016-05-01 09:16:29 -0500 | received badge | ● Teacher (source) |
2016-05-01 06:40:16 -0500 | answered a question | Errors using EMS on E+ to simulate dynamic insulation Thank you for the input Archmage. 1 - I need to use CondFD because I need to use the temperatures inside the construction (CTF only assesses the heat balance regarding the outside and inside surface of the wall). This way I can plot the profile of the temperatures inside the wall. 2 - Moreover, I tried different combinations of the parameters in the HeatBalanceSettings:ConductionFiniteDifference object, but it always failed to equal the number of nodes in both surfaces. The thing is that I do not know what is the adequate criteria to define the changes on those parameters. I understand their meaning but not what I have to do to perform the changes I want to implement in terms of temperature nodes. 3 - Finally, I broke the insulation layer on WALLS_HIGHCOND surface in two layers (each one of 5 cm).. and once more it failed to equal the number of nodes. Then I remember that from the literature review I did regarding these temperature nodes on CondFD, I saw that they also depend on the timestep of the simulation. So after having two layers, as you proposed, I tried changing the number of timesteps from 60 to 30 => Problem Solved (No Errors) |
2016-05-01 05:46:48 -0500 | received badge | ● Scholar (source) |
2016-04-30 16:50:34 -0500 | received badge | ● Supporter (source) |
2016-04-26 09:48:16 -0500 | received badge | ● Student (source) |
2016-04-26 09:47:37 -0500 | asked a question | Errors using EMS on E+ to simulate dynamic insulation Hello everyone. My name is João Tiago Homem, and I am currently doing my master thesis on Dynamic Insulation. In the process, I am trying to simulate elements of insulation (on the walls) that offer a dynamic behavior rather than a static one, by means of: 1 - Changing its conductivity 2 - Adding/Removing a certain layer of insulation in the construction 3 - Changing its thickness To do so, I am using EnergyManagementSystem (EMS) on EnergyPlus to achieve these changes throughout the simulation period. Details of the model:
Action on EMS For instance, I am trying to change the conductivity of the insulation of the walls, from High (0.08) to Low (0.04) whenever a certain condition is true:
Errors Every time I run the simulation, I get this errors: *** No node connection errors were found. *** Beginning Simulation * Severe * InitEMSControlledConstructions: EMS Construction State Actuator not valid. * ~~~ * Construction named = WALLS_LOWCOND has number of finite difference nodes =5 * ~~~ * While construction named = WALLS_HIGHCOND has number of finite difference nodes =4 * ~~~ * This actuator is not allowed for surface name = SOUTHWALL, and the simulation continues without the override * Severe * InitEMSControlledConstructions: EMS Construction State Actuator not valid. * ~~~ * Construction named = WALLS_LOWCOND has number of finite difference nodes =5 * ~~~ * While construction named = WALLS_HIGHCONDhas number of finite difference nodes =4 * ~~~ * This actuator is not allowed for surface name = WESTWALL, and the simulation continues without the override * Severe * InitEMSControlledConstructions: EMS Construction State Actuator not valid. * ~~~ * Construction named = WALLS_LOWCOND has number of finite difference nodes =5 * ~~~ * While construction named = WALLS_HIGHCONDhas number of finite difference nodes =4 * ~~~ * This actuator is not allowed for surface name = NORTHWALL, and the simulation continues without the override * Severe * InitEMSControlledConstructions: EMS Construction State Actuator not valid. * ~~~ * Construction named = WALLS_LOWCOND has number of finite difference nodes =5 * ~~~ * While construction named = WALLS_HIGHCONDhas number of finite difference nodes =4 * ~~~ * This actuator is not allowed for surface name = EASTWALL, and the simulation continues without the override If I do the same procedure changing the thickness instead of conductivity, I get the same errors. I already checked all the posts on the community regarding EMS or changeable U-value but they didn't help me finding the solution. What do you think about this? |
2016-04-26 09:31:39 -0500 | received badge | ● Organizer (source) |