keb's profile - activity

Yes I actually looked for time series data for the equipment of the zones. But their variable didn't print out. Could no

I posted a similar question here, so I thought that I would post a comment here since it is related.

Choosing setpoint manager for packaged rooftops? I looked through this post, and had the same question for three similar

What is the Openstudio HTML file? Something different than the .osm file? Are you saying look at the E+ and OS html fil

Thanks for the feedback. I've looked at the Spaces tab and filtered to the first of three zones to clear them up one at

Thanks for the feedback. I've looked at the Spaces tab and filtered to the first of three zones to clear them up one at

Check out this video; this is a training video and I've set it to start exactly where it answers your question.

Why are equipment loads are not identical in zones? I have Proposed and Baseline models and all equipment loads energy u

Why are equipment loads are not identical in zones? I have Proposed and Baseline models and all equipment loads energy u

Why are equipment loads are not identical in zones? I have Proposed and Baseline models and all equipment loads energy u

Your first point is how I originally thought it would be, but the units are incorrect in the input field if that's the w

What setpoint manager is necessary for the heating coil in the above example? Heating room setpoint is 70F.

I'm not sure how I get this measure from OS SDK into OS. Is this actually the one I want?

I'm not sure how I get this measure from OS SDK into OS. I this actually the one I want?

Thanks I'll look into it. That doesn't sound like much of a learning curve in so far as getting perhaps monthly ground t

Thank you both very much for the responses. Very helpful and great reference point. Is KIVA accessible in an existing m

Simulation runs without ground temperatures set? My model runs fine. Yay! However, I want to scrutinize what's happening

Simulation runs without ground temperatures set? My model runs fine. Yay! However, I want to scrutinize what's happening

I would like to know if there's an update on this too. :)

Could you clarify Infiltration entry fields? In the documentation here , infiltration field are described that are inclu

Could you clarify Infiltration entry fields? In the documentation here , infiltration field are described that are inclu

Could you clarify Infiltration entry fields? In the documentation here , infiltration field are described that are inclu

Appendix G is not applicable at all for IECC 2015 compliance?

We are close to getting an ideal air loads config to work, but receive the following errors: * Severe * <root>

Why is a fresh diagnostic OS file not opening? I have just run the diagnostic script on a model and I have tried to open

We are running OS 2.9.1

diagnostic: https://www.dropbox.com/s/90rx8mgvgrs1o39/IDEA%20Parmer%20Park%20Photos.zip?dl=0

We ran the diagnostic after trying to run the model with first just the ideal air loads. It gave a degenerate error not

Where is this precision changed?

Hi Annie, I have a model with a similar degenerate surface problem. I've posted the question on unmet hours yesterday.

Why is a fresh diagnostic OS file not opening? I have just run the diagnostic script on a model and I have tried to open

That was one of the first things I checked. Coil capacity is maxed to rated capacity but LAT is not reaching target. I

Yes I thought of that as well. Target and actual loop temp are nearly one line visualized on the time series plot, fluct

The max supply temp target in the HTL is 86 which appears to be met. I'm aware of that previous version bug. FP2 appear

For airflow controls, are you referring to controller MC4 should be set to On Continuously?

What can be causing unmet cooling hours in IESVE, system 9c? I'm having an issue with resolving unmet cooling hours on a

Run errors; no ground temperatures input, surface data... I am sorting through some run errors in an Openstudio 2.8.1 mo

Run errors; no ground temperatures input, surface data... I am sorting through some run errors in an Openstudio 2.8.1 mo

No ground temperatures input I am sorting through some run errors in an Openstudio 2.8.1 model and trying to troubleshoo

No ground temperatures input I am sorting through some run errors in an Openstudio 2.8.1 model and trying to troubleshoo

Thank you! There were two. I deleted the old one. What is the next step? Don't want to misstep on this.

I can find Construction Sets with the 2013 prefix but no space types with that 90.1-2013 prefix after I go to Load Libra

I tried the measure but it failed. Standard Output: [13:40:22.787153 ERROR] undefined method get_lookup_name' for # C:

I'm trying to load and assign 90.1-2013, similar to the ways shown above. I believe it loads in the OS app, but when I

I'm trying to load and assign 90.1-2013, similar to the ways shown above. I believe it loads in the OS app, but when I

Please provide further details regarding this measure. What are its limitations? Its main assumptions? This measure nicely strips existing HVAC equipment from a model and runs an "optimally-sized" ground loop and that it "reflects the HVACE recommendations of the 50% K-12 AEDG" guide. How is this ground loop size calculated to float between 5C and 21C as the measures specifies, and what/where are the soil properties and borefield configuration details that influence the performance of the ground exchanger?

In a Distributed Analysis (when I have plenums), is it possible to have the existing "set-window-to-wall-ratio" measure disregard the exterior surfaces of the plenums if included in the Analysis Spreadsheet?

The building won't use plenums for return air actually, they are just there currently in the Revit model and will likely remain. Just curious if the measure as it stands can or can't be pinpoint-directed to surfaces (or, groups of surfaces with a common name tag for instance) in a Distributed Analysis, or if cardinal direction is the only distinguishing characteristic to apply.

I am using PAT with a base model that has no windows. I'm running a WWR measure for each cardinal direction and then three Add Daylight Sensor measures for specific space types. I run the baseline, baseline w/o sensors, baseline w/sensors as my three design alternatives primarily to see how much savings there are with adding the daylight sensors versus no sensors. Results are the same though. I've looked at the generated osm files in these two design alternatives and the windows are generated as expected in both, as are the sensors placed in the last design alternative. I review the PAT outputs on the Run tab for each of these alternatives as well: while the space types for the daylight sensors are shown as being recognized, there is an NA or Not Applied reported for each daylight sensor measure. I'm confused why on the one hand all space types are recognized for sensor placement, but they are Not Applied. At the same time, sensors are actually placed in the model as reflected in the osm file for the alternative that has the place sensor measures.

I've seen under-selling and over-selling services. What do you consider example(s) of achieving a balance to architects and owners?