APN's profile - activity

@Aaron Boranian thanks for yor attention. I tried setting surface convection coefficients manually and it worked well. H

@Aaron Boranian thanks for yor attention. I tried setting surface convection coefficients manually and it worked well. H

Problem in orientational survey with E+: the results differences are not explainable I study the wall application of con

Problem in orientational survey with E+: the results differences are not explainable I study the wall application of con

Have anyone any exprience in orientational studies with E+?? I have created a simple model with cavities defined as zone

Have anyone any exprience in orientational studies with E+ I have created a simple model wit cavities defined as zones.

Have anyone any exprience in orientational studies with E+ I have created a simple model wit cavities defined as zones.

@Aaron Boranian where can I provide the idf file? I used Energy transfer: facility values as the energy consumption...is

I used Energy transfer: facility values as the energy consumption...is not it true?

@Aaron Boranian I did changed the north axis in my script...today I recreated my model and the results are becoming more

Both units are in degrees, and it is not the case.

I study the wall application of configurations with reflective insulation systems in different climates. I have conducted a macro parametric investigation with EnergyPlus version 9.2, using Python scripts to run the models. I studied the impacts of orientation on the energy consumption of my models using the script to rotate the models with 1 degree intervals. I faced an unexplained difference between results with changing the model orientation(I have also conducted the simulations manually in some orientations and the same results are obtained). The variations in energy consumptions by 1 degree increments are not explainable and I can provide the outcomes. I simulated in 360 degrees (Angle) and in 6 different climates of iran (Location) using the weather data files available on the EnergyPlus website, and this issue happened in all of the outputs. I used 7 different models in simulations (which is shown by 1,2,...,7). Differences in results with 1 degree differences are not explainable and I believe there must be a problem in Energyplus calculations.

I would like to ask you about the reasons of this issue and possible solutions.

Problem in orientational survey with E+: the results differences are not explainable I study the wall application of con

Problem in orientational survey with E+: the results differences are not explainable I study the wall application of con

Problem in orientational survey with E+: the results differences are not explainable I study the wall application of con

@Aaron Boranian the image is attached now...the difference in one degree orientations is strange and the reseon is not c

@Aaron Boranian excuse me to ask it but as I am new to this site I couldnot upload the image from my problem..can you te

Please answer my question🙏`

Problem in orientational survey with E+ I study the wall application of configurations with reflective insulation system

Problem in orientational survey with E+ I study the wall application of configurations with reflective insulation system