First time here? Check out the Help page!

Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

setpoint manager symbol lost in OpenStudio

When opening an 1.4.0 osm-file with OpenStudio 1.8.0 in the plant loop schematic the symbol for a setpoint gets lost, although apparently the data associated with the setpoint manager have been read in.

image description

click to hide/show revision 2
No.2 Revision

setpoint manager symbol lost in OpenStudio

When opening an 1.4.0 osm-file with OpenStudio 1.8.0 in the plant loop schematic the symbol for a setpoint setpoint manager gets lost, although apparently the data associated with the setpoint manager have been read in.

image description

click to hide/show revision 3
No.3 Revision

setpoint manager symbol lost in OpenStudio

When opening an 1.4.0 osm-file with OpenStudio 1.8.0 1.8.0, in the plant loop schematic the symbol for a setpoint manager gets lost, although apparently the data associated with the setpoint manager have been read in.

image description

setpoint manager symbol lost in OpenStudio

When opening an 1.4.0 osm-file with OpenStudio 1.8.0, in the plant loop schematic the symbol for a setpoint manager gets lost, although apparently the data associated with the setpoint manager have been read in.

image description

click to hide/show revision 5
No.5 Revision

setpoint manager symbol lost in OpenStudio

In the following instances I have observed that in the OpenStudio 1.8.0 HVAC schematic the setpoint manager symbol gets lost:

(1) If Control Variable is set to Maximum Temperature, the SPM symbol disappears, including the visual handle for deleting the setpoint manager.

(2) When opening an 1.4.0 osm-file with OpenStudio 1.8.0, in the plant loop schematic the symbol for a setpoint manager manager gets lost, lost if Control Variable was set to Maximum Temperature in the 1.4.0 osm-file, although apparently the data associated with the setpoint manager have been read in.in.

image description

Apparently this is a new bug which did not exist in previous version(s).