Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

asked 2020-03-09 12:26:25 -0600

bmjohn's avatar

Discrepancy in values in running both Conventional and VRF systems in 2 different locations.

I have run a model using VRF and conventional systems in 2 different locations from CBECC and OpenStudio. The Design Size Gross Rated Total Capacity happens to be the same for both VRF and Conventional but is different for another location. I am not sure why that difference occurs. Does anyone have any pointers? I will appreciate it.

click to hide/show revision 2
retagged

updated 2020-03-11 08:04:37 -0600

__AmirRoth__'s avatar

Discrepancy in values in running both Conventional and VRF systems in 2 different locations.

I have run a model using VRF and conventional systems in 2 different locations from CBECC and OpenStudio. The Design Size Gross Rated Total Capacity happens to be the same for both VRF and Conventional but is different for another location. I am not sure why that difference occurs. Does anyone have any pointers? I will appreciate it.

About | Help | Privacy | Legal | Contact
Site design and logo: Copyright © 2015 Big Ladder Software LLC. All rights reserved.
The Unmet Hours and Big Ladder names and logos are trademarks of Big Ladder Software LLC.
User contributions licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 License.
Powered by