 | 1 | initial version |
There are times when I have had to copy or modify objects in my OSM file by hand. I get that each object has a handle and that the objects refer to each other by handle instead of names. If I copy an object I usually just change a number or two in the handle to create a new one, is this ok? Is there a better way to create a handle for an OSM object?
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
There are times when I have had to copy or modify objects in my OSM file by hand. I get that each object has a handle and that the objects refer to each other by handle instead of names. If I copy an object I usually just change a number or two in the handle to create a new one, is this ok? Is there a better way to create a handle for an OSM object?
| | 3 | retagged |
There are times when I have had to copy or modify objects in my OSM file by hand. I get that each object has a handle and that the objects refer to each other by handle instead of names. If I copy an object I usually just change a number or two in the handle to create a new one, is this ok? Is there a better way to create a handle for an OSM object?
| | 4 | retagged |
There are times when I have had to copy or modify objects in my OSM file by hand. I get that each object has a handle and that the objects refer to each other by handle instead of names. If I copy an object I usually just change a number or two in the handle to create a new one, is this ok? Is there a better way to create a handle for an OSM object?
