 | 1 | initial version |
I tried to simulate the BESTEST case 600 using openstudio for a demonstration. When I used refraction extenction method for the windows( cause should be more accurate), my results were out of BESTEST range. Then I used the GLAZING WINDOW MATERIALS in the openstudio to enter the window data and the results became exactly in the range. What is the problem with the first method which should provide more accurate results?
| | 2 | retagged |
I tried to simulate the BESTEST case 600 using openstudio for a demonstration. When I used refraction extenction method for the windows( cause should be more accurate), my results were out of BESTEST range. Then I used the GLAZING WINDOW MATERIALS in the openstudio to enter the window data and the results became exactly in the range. What is the problem with the first method which should provide more accurate results?
| | 3 | retagged |
I tried to simulate the BESTEST case 600 using openstudio for a demonstration. When I used refraction extenction method for the windows( cause should be more accurate), my results were out of BESTEST range. Then I used the GLAZING WINDOW MATERIALS in the openstudio to enter the window data and the results became exactly in the range. What is the problem with the first method which should provide more accurate results?
| | 4 | retagged |
I tried to simulate the BESTEST case 600 using openstudio for a demonstration. When I used refraction extenction method for the windows( cause should be more accurate), my results were out of BESTEST range. Then I used the GLAZING WINDOW MATERIALS in the openstudio to enter the window data and the results became exactly in the range. What is the problem with the first method which should provide more accurate results?
| | 5 | retagged |
I tried to simulate the BESTEST case 600 using openstudio for a demonstration. When I used refraction extenction method for the windows( cause should be more accurate), my results were out of BESTEST range. Then I used the GLAZING WINDOW MATERIALS in the openstudio to enter the window data and the results became exactly in the range. What is the problem with the first method which should provide more accurate results?
| | 6 | retagged |
I tried to simulate the BESTEST case 600 using openstudio for a demonstration. When I used refraction extenction method for the windows( cause should be more accurate), my results were out of BESTEST range. Then I used the GLAZING WINDOW MATERIALS in the openstudio to enter the window data and the results became exactly in the range. What is the problem with the first method which should provide more accurate results?
