AllSummaryAndSizingPeriod Measure

asked 2024-07-26 20:40:15 -0500

obuchely

1394 ●14 ●13 https://www.linkedin.c...

updated 2024-07-29 07:37:48 -0500

Aaron Boranian

13965 ●80 ●24 http://bigladdersoftware.com/

I am trying to create a measure that allows me to get the AllSummaryAndSizingPeriod report instead of the AllSummary report.

The measure ran with out errors but I can not get the report.

class AddAllSummaryAndSizingPeriod < OpenStudio::Measure::ModelMeasure
  def name
    return "Agregar AllSummaryAndSizingPeriod"
  end

  def arguments(model)
    args = OpenStudio::Measure::OSArgumentVector.new
    return args
  end

  def run(model, runner, user_arguments)
    super(model, runner, user_arguments)
    model = runner.lastOpenStudioModel
    if model.empty?
      runner.registerError("No model found.")
      return false
    end
    model = model.get
    output_table = OpenStudio::IdfObject.load("Output:Table:SummaryReports,AllSummaryAndSizingPeriod;").get
    model.addObject(output_table)
    return true
  end
end

answered 2024-07-28 09:11:34 -0500

Denis Bourgeois
2686 ●98 ●8 http://www.rd2.ca

updated 2024-07-30 06:35:36 -0500

Can you try the following:

output_tables = model.getOutputTableSummaryReports
output_tables.addSummaryReport("AllSummaryAndSizingPeriod")

These standard output table reports have been mapped in the OpenStudio SDK since v3.0.0 (2020) - no longer any need to call IDF objects. Tested - works.

image description

EDIT: This seems odd:

def run(model, runner, user_arguments)
    super(model, runner, user_arguments)
    model = runner.lastOpenStudioModel

The run call has "model" as an argument - what one expects for a ModelMeasure (see here). Yet the runner.lastOpenStudioModel call (what one evokes with a recently ran simulation for a ReportingMeasure) ends up overwriting "model". Hence the measure is modifying the wrong model, I think (not tested). So a first move IMO would be to delete (or comment out):