Heating setpoint decreased by 2°C but the overall energy requirenment increses

asked 2024-05-27 10:12:47 -0500

Yagnik's avatar

updated 2024-05-28 02:54:16 -0500

Hello, I have concern about getting the cooling and humidification load increased drastically for the model by decreasing heating setpoint by 2°C.

IDF - https://drive.google.com/drive/folder...

I have just changed the class list - Shcedule:Compact from

Schedule:Compact,
  Htg-SetP-Sch, !- Name
  Temperature, !- Schedule Type Limits Name
  Through: 12/31, !- Field 1
  For: Weekends HoliDay, !- Field 2
  Until: 7:00, !- Field 3
  16, !- Field 4
  Until: 14:00, !- Field 5
  16, !- Field 6
  Until: 24:00, !- Field 7
  16, !- Field 8
  For: SummerDesignDay, !- Field 9
  Until: 24:00, !- Field 10
  16, !- Field 11
  For: WinterDesignDay, !- Field 12
  Until: 24:00, !- Field 13
  21, !- Field 14
  For: AllOtherDays, !- Field 15
  Until: 5:00, !- Field 16
  16, !- Field 17
  Until: 6:00, !- Field 18
  20, !- Field 19
  Until: 20:00, !- Field 20
  22, !- Field 21
  Until: 24:00, !- Field 22
  16; !- Field 23

to

Schedule:Compact,
  Htg-SetP-Sch, !- Name
  Temperature, !- Schedule Type Limits Name
  Through: 12/31, !- Field 1
  For: Weekends HoliDay, !- Field 2
  Until: 7:00, !- Field 3
  14, !- Field 4
  Until: 14:00, !- Field 5
  14, !- Field 6
  Until: 24:00, !- Field 7
  14, !- Field 8
  For: SummerDesignDay, !- Field 9
  Until: 24:00, !- Field 10
  14, !- Field 11
  For: WinterDesignDay, !- Field 12
  Until: 24:00, !- Field 13
  19, !- Field 14
  For: AllOtherDays, !- Field 15
  Until: 5:00, !- Field 16
  14, !- Field 17
  Until: 6:00, !- Field 18
  18, !- Field 19
  Until: 20:00, !- Field 20
  20, !- Field 21
  Until: 24:00, !- Field 22
  14; !- Field 23

but instead of decreasing energy demand it increased because of the sharp rise in cooling and humidification demand, even though rest of the setpoints have not changed.

Why is the increased cooling load ?

KR, Yagnik

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

@Yagnik can you upload your model to Google Drive, Dropbox, etc. and then share a URL for others to download? That would help others provide better solutions.

Aaron Boranian's avatar Aaron Boranian  ( 2024-05-27 11:56:06 -0500 )edit

@Aaron Boranian here is the google drive link and i have also updated in the question above. IDF - https://drive.google.com/drive/folder...

Yagnik's avatar Yagnik  ( 2024-05-28 02:55:54 -0500 )edit

Hello @rraustad, I don't understand the behaviour of the model. if I decrease heating setpoints, why is there drastic increase in cooling demand that eventually the total energy demand remains same after the decrease in heating setpoints too ? please make it clear for me. I have added the IDF link too..

Yagnik's avatar Yagnik  ( 2024-05-28 04:44:06 -0500 )edit

@Yagnik is it a cooling demand increase or a dehumidification demand increase? My first guess is the lower heating set point allows the cooling coil to drive down the zone temperature when dehumidification is required. This makes it harder for the coil to dehumidify and the cooling coil needs to work morer. If you change Controller:WaterCoil from TemperatureAndHumidityRatio to Temperature you should see the results you expect. Then you can investigate my guess/assumption.

rraustad's avatar rraustad  ( 2024-05-28 10:21:59 -0500 )edit

Hello @rraustad, both the cooling and humidification load got increased when I decrease heating setpoint. in fact, cooling and humidification demand increases that much that over pass the previous total deamnd too, when model run on normal heating setpoint (before decresing). so my question is after lowering heating setpoint, why is the overall load get increaed ? I am doing this experiment to assess the imact of decreased setpoint and how can it affect on overall co2 emissions ? but surprisingly, I got increased overall demand.

Yagnik's avatar Yagnik  ( 2024-05-29 02:19:15 -0500 )edit