Furnace Efficiency DOE-2/EnergyPLus

asked 2015-05-21 18:45:22 -0500

Jeremy

1617 ●8 ●14 https://www.linkedin.c...

updated 2015-11-23 08:50:30 -0500

__AmirRoth__

4436 ●5 ●17 http://bleedinggreenna...

In the EnergyPlus documentation, for the description of the part-load fraction performance curve for the furnaces, it says: "This [...] performance curve [...] parameterizes the variation of gas consumption rate by the heating coil as a function of the part load ratio [...]. For any simulation timestep, the nominal gas consumption rate (heating load/burner efficiency) is divided by the part-load fraction (PLF) if a part-load curve has been defined."

DOE-2 calculates the HIR-op as the product of the rated HIR and the HIR-FPLR(PLR).

I compared the default (when using a template) EnergyPlus performance curve for the PLF and the default curve for HIR-FPLR(PLR) in eQUEST. They are pretty pretty similar! Which makes me thinks that we can consider that PLF = HIR-FPLR(PLR).

The HIR for a particular time step is ratio the of fuel used to the heating energy produced.

According to the DOE-2 definition we have: Conso-op = f(Conso-rated * HIR-FPLR(PLR))

According to the EnergyPlus definition we have: Conso-op = f(Conso-rated / PLF)

Which is not the same thing and makes me think that PLF <> HIR-FPLR(PLR) ... Am I missing something?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

add a comment

6

answered 2015-05-28 11:59:53 -0500

Jeremy

1617 ●8 ●14 https://www.linkedin.c...

A little update as it might be useful for other users.

Neal's answer made sense the way he presented it. However, it didn't quite add up with the data I had. To find out what the calculation is in both cases, I generated hourly reports in both eQUEST and EnergyPlus. Here is what I found out:

Calculation of the fuel consumption in DOE-2:

Calculation of the PLR: PLR = (Load for the hour) / (Total Furnace Capacity)
Use the PLR to get the HIR f(PLR) using the performance curve attached to the system
Calculation of the operational HIR: HIR-op = HIR f(PLR) * HIR-rated
Fuel consumption: Qfuel = (Total Furnace Capacity) * HIR-op (eq. 1)

Here is an excerpt from an hourly report from eQUEST that illustrate the calculation:

In this example, the total furnace capacity is 39988 Btu/h and the rated HIR is 1.25.

Calculation of the fuel consumption in EnergyPlus:

Calculation of the PLR: PLR = (Load for the hour) / (Total Furnace Capacity)
Use the PLR to get the PLF f(PLR) using the performance curve attached to the system
Fuel consumption: Qfuel = (Total Furnace Capacity) * PLR * HIR-rated / PLF (eq. 2)

Here is an excerpt from an hourly report from EnergyPlus that illustrate the calculation:

In this example, the total furnace capacity is 39988 Btu/h and the rated HIR is 1.25.

Comparison:

Then, if we look at (eq. 1) and (eq. 2):

HIR f(PLR) * HIR-rated = PLR * HIR-rated / PLF
Which simplifies to HIR f(PLR) = PLR / PLF
Thus PLF = PLR / HIR f(PLR)

In conclusion PLF and HIR f(PLR) are not quite the same.

Using this relation I converted the curve used in eQUEST (by default) to the match the PLF used in EnergyPlus.

EnergyPlus PLF = f(PLR) is the default curve used in EnergyPlus
eQUEST PLF = f(PLR) is the default curve used in eQUEST converted to the EnergyPlus "format".

edit flag offensive delete link

Comments

This makes sense to me. I couldn't remember if PLR was implicit in the HIR curve in DOE-2, or accounted for separately.

Neal Kruis ( 2015-05-28 13:00:26 -0500 )edit

1

Amazing post! I remember scratching my head about this when I first started using e+ / os, I stopped using it for a while and recently started back up and encountered the exact same issue! This post refreshed my memory. Thanks so much!