Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question

energy consumption increase with ERV?

asked 2022-05-25 09:01:19 -0500

mattkoch's avatar

updated 2022-05-25 16:03:50 -0500

I have a fairly simple model with two large singe zone CAV AHU and one large multi-zone VAV AHU. The CAV AHU have CHW cooling and HW heating coils, the VAV AHU has a CHW cooling coil, with HW reheating coils in its seven (7) VAV terminal units. CHW and HW are district energy, i.e. no local chiller or boiler. All three AHU also have some OA (10% ... 15%). During occupied hours, these have both a thermostat and a humidistat. Both temperatures and humidities come out as expected when running the model and reviewing data in DView, as do flow rates.

So then I thought I'd add ERV to each AHU and see what happens. All I do is insert a HeatExchanger:AirToAir:SensibleAndLatent, set its flow rate to the OA flow rate of the AHU (from Controller:OutdoorAir, which has minimum and maximum set to the same value), set "Supply Air Outlet Temperature Control" to "No" and then run the model.

When I do that, the EUI increases (!) from 131.60 kBTU/ft2/y to 137.65 kBTU/ft2/y, and the increase is due almost entirely to increases in district cooling and especially district heating. When I look at the heat exchanger cooling and heating rate in DView, there is some energy being exchanged in summer and winter (all positive numbers), something like 10% of the CHW cooling and HW heating coil energy.

So why does the EUI increase with ERV? I am not even adjusting for any pressure drop increase due to the presence of the ERV in the air stream, and the increase, like I said, seems to be almost entirely due to district energy anyway. By the way, the Heat Recovery Bypass Status and Economizer Status appear to be zero at all hours, too.

Update <<<

For what it is worth, I added a few images from DVIEW. In each image, the top shows the cooling and heating coil rate, as well as - where applicable - the ERV heat exchange rate. The bottom shows the mixed and outdoor air flow rates. Because of 24 h dehumidification, the HVAC schedule is always on. For "No Eco, No ERV" as well as for "ERV", I limited the outdoor air flow to the minimum outdoor air flow, while for "Eco" and "Eco & ERV", I allowed the outdoor air flow to be as much as the mixed air flow, if the outdoor air controller wanted it to.

No Eco, No ERV image description

Eco image description

ERV image description

Eco & ERV image description

I find the double "hump" in cases with Eco interesting - this destroys any gains made elsewhere. And for cases with ERV, the cooling/heating coils run in the first two days where they are much smaller for "No Eco, No ERV", again requiring more energy. So the observation of higher EUI with Eco and/or ERV might be explained this way, but why do the coils do this?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete


By the way, am I correct in tolerating an EUI of near 130 with district energy, when a RTU or local CHW/HW system may yield an EUI of something more like 60? This is because in the first case I am counting thermal energy and in the second case I am counting electrical energy (which generates like 3 times as much in thermal energy)?

mattkoch's avatar mattkoch  ( 2022-05-25 09:04:21 -0500 )edit

Have you compared the hourly OA flow rates between the two models to make sure they are the same?

shorowit's avatar shorowit  ( 2022-05-25 10:09:18 -0500 )edit

Yes, for all practical purposes, MA and OA flow rates on hourly basis are identical between no ERV and ERV.

mattkoch's avatar mattkoch  ( 2022-05-25 11:12:43 -0500 )edit

You are right in accounting that the site EUI will be significantly higher if the building uses district energy versus using an on-site plant. Source EUI should be closer.

Luis Lara's avatar Luis Lara  ( 2022-05-26 08:30:01 -0500 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2022-05-27 06:21:02 -0500

mdedoes's avatar

I've seen increases in energy use with ER in AHUs in models before. Usually, switching the "Supply Air Temperature Control" to "Yes" fixes the problem. I may be misunderstanding your problem, but here's what usually happens for me.

If your supply air temperature setpoint is 55°F, then on mild days (say about 45-50°F outside), the ER unit can get the air hotter than that (maybe about 58°F). Then, the cooling coil has to operate to meet the supply air temperature, then the heating coil may reheat in the VAV system

To check this, I would look at the temperature leaving the ERV, the OA temperature, the supply air temperature, and the heating/cooling provided. The temperature of the air leaving the ERV should be somewhere in between the OAT and the SAT (or equal to the SAT). If it "crosses over" the SAT, then the unit is cooling/heating when it shouldn't be. By controlling the ERV to the SAT, this crossover is avoided.

Hope this helps!

edit flag offensive delete link more


I went hunting for those temperature discrepancies you mention but am not sure I found them. I had already set Supply Air Outlet Temperature Control to "Yes", and your note encouraged me to go digging a little deeper. As it turns out, one also must insert a setpoint manager at the fresh air supply node (outlet of HeatExchanger:AirtoAir:SensibleAndLatent on the outdoor air side). I tried a SetpointManager:FollowSystemNodeTemperature to follow the CHW coil outlet node (there is a SetpointManager:SingleZone:HumidityMaximum there). Then I tried to follow the air loop supply outlet node.

mattkoch's avatar mattkoch  ( 2022-05-27 17:07:51 -0500 )edit

... neither helped much. Then I picked a SetpointManager:Scheduled and successively set it to 52, 53, 54 and 55 oF. All four temperatures more or less resulted in an EUI betwen 127.69 and 127.82 kBTU/ft2/y. So a reduction from the original 137.65 kBTU/ft2/y and even down below the baseline 131.60 kBTU/ft2/y now seems possible. However, compared to the cost of an ERV, the savings are negligible, making me think ERV are pointless in South Texas.

mattkoch's avatar mattkoch  ( 2022-05-27 17:39:28 -0500 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Training Workshops

Question Tools

1 follower


Asked: 2022-05-25 09:01:19 -0500

Seen: 168 times

Last updated: May 27