Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get s tarted with the Help page
Ask Your Question

View matrix MS Windows vs Linux

asked 2019-05-24 14:30:20 -0600

Determinant gravatar image

updated 2019-05-24 14:54:33 -0600

A very obscure question but maybe someone will know the answer.

I have created view matrix files with the same rfluxmtx command and materials and scene geometry, but the files come out noticeably different between MS Windows and Linux (different machines for both). I've compared the numbers. It seems to be more than just due to just the Monte Carlo method because if I re-run the command on the same machine, the VMXs do not differ by that much, if at all.

Does it have to do with the precision of Windows vs Linux? Maybe the "random" function inherent to rfluxmtx is machine dependent (as it can be in C++ if you don't seed it.).

here are the commands (originally from OS Radiance measure but I am using them on the command line). Of course in Linux it's cat instead of type and the \ become /. Also, I copied the folders directly from the first machine (Windows) to the second machine (Lubuntu).

type "materials\materials_vmx.rad" scene\shades\WG10_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG11_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG12_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG1_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG2_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG3_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG4_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG5_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG6_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG7_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG8_SHADE.rad scene\shades\WG9_SHADE.rad > receivers_vmx.rad

oconv materials\materials.rad scene\090_10_Wn_Spc.rad scene\090_20_Wn_Spc.rad scene\090_30_Wn_Spc.rad scene\090_40_Wn_Spc.rad scene\180_10_Wn_Spc.rad scene\180_20_Wn_Spc.rad scene\180_30_Wn_Spc.rad scene\180_40_Wn_Spc.rad scene\270_10_Wn_Spc.rad scene\270_20_Wn_Spc.rad scene\270_30_Wn_Spc.rad scene\270_40_Wn_Spc.rad > octrees\model_vmx.oct

rfluxmtx -ab 6 -ad 4050 -as 256 -dj 1 -dp 1 -dt 0 -dc 1 -lw 0.001  -n 1 -ds .15 -faa -y 594 -I -v - receivers_vmx.rad -i octrees\model_vmx.oct < numeric\
edit retag flag offensive close merge delete


Well, this is interesting. If you are certain the commands and the input are identical, then let's see your commands and output(s).

rpg777 gravatar image rpg777  ( 2019-05-24 14:43:57 -0600 )edit

Need more info?

Determinant gravatar image Determinant  ( 2019-05-24 14:55:41 -0600 )edit

Different by how much? Is it a systematic error, where one or the other is consistently greater, or have you noticed something else? The random number generator in rcontrib (called by rfluxmtx) is seeded by the clock, so the variance between runs should roughly equal the variance between machines.

GregWard gravatar image GregWard  ( 2019-05-25 08:23:57 -0600 )edit

Good question: Point by point, % diffs look >> 100%, but order of magnitudes diffs are ~7%. Either way I've run it a few more times on Linux and now the differences do seem just random. My original confusion was based on significant differences in results from an annual illuminance simulation. When I compared all the input files in the project, only the view matrices seemed significantly different. Maybe annual sim diffs are due to low-resolution Klems-basis BSDF combined with random rays for view (i.e. a small change in ray angle lands on a big change in BSDF transmittance)?

Determinant gravatar image Determinant  ( 2019-05-28 15:49:03 -0600 )edit

Our plan over the next months is to develop a tool that will help figure out the resolution needed for window matrix and area subdivision, as it's been a perennial problem for everyone using 3+ phase methods....

GregWard gravatar image GregWard  ( 2019-05-28 16:00:47 -0600 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted

answered 2019-05-31 16:52:09 -0600

Determinant gravatar image

View matrices were not significantly different. After running a few times the differences do indeed seem random.

The differences in daylighting that I got might be due to small changes in that randomness causing rays to intersect a low resolution BSDF on a significantly different "patch".

edit flag offensive delete link more

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer


Question Tools



Asked: 2019-05-24 14:30:20 -0600

Seen: 247 times

Last updated: May 31 '19