Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question
2

IDFupdater remove FenestrationSurface:Detailed objects

asked 2019-01-29 06:35:29 -0600

ngkhanh's avatar

updated 2019-02-12 13:12:02 -0600

Hi, I try to update IDF file from version 8.6 to version 9.0 but modified one has all FenestrationSurface:Detailed removed. EP 8.6 could run it successfully. Don't understand why FenestrationSurface:Detailed has been being removed without replacement objects - is it error?
thanks
The original file: 8.6.0 The updated: 9.0.1

Conversion 8.6 => 8.7 Starting new Transition.audit Will create new full IDFs Will create new IDF lines with units where applicable Will create new IDF lines leaving blank incoming fields as blank (no default fill) Processing IDF -- G:\new_export.idf
* Warning * Alpha Argument length exceeds maximum, will be truncated= Heated Combined ground floor - State-of-the-art - Heavyweight (data modified when loaded to file)_Rev
* ~~~ * Will be processed as Alpha=Heated Combined ground floor - State-of-the-art - Heavyweight (data modified when loaded to file)_Re

Conversion 8.7 => 8.8 Starting new Transition.audit Will create new full IDFs Will create new IDF lines with units where applicable Will create new IDF lines leaving blank incoming fields as blank (no default fill) Processing IDF -- G:\new_export.idf
* Warning * Object=FenestrationSurface:Detailed, name=FacultyOfficeXnorth:Zone1XOfficeNorth_Wall_2_2_0_0_0_0_Win, entered with less than minimum number of fields. * ~~~ * Attempting fill to minimum. * Severe * Object=FenestrationSurface:Detailed, name=FacultyOfficeXnorth:Zone1XOfficeNorth_Wall_2_2_0_0_0_0_Win, Required Field=[Vertex 1 Z-coordinate] was blank.
.............. Many repeated Warning and all FenestrationSurface:Detailed disappeared in updated idf I could not find problems with mentioned surfaces while it could run with EP 8.6

          FenestrationSurface:Detailed,
 FacultyOfficeXnorth:Zone1XOfficeNorth_Wall_2_2_0_0_0_0_Win,  !- Window name
         Window,                                  !- Class
         1001,                                    !- Construction Name
         FacultyOfficeXnorth:Zone1XOfficeNorth_Wall_2_2_0,  !- Base surface
         ,                                        !- corresponding other window subsurface
         AutoCalculate,                           !- View Factor to Ground
         ,                                        !- Window shading control
         ,                                        !- Frame divider name
         1,                                       !- Multiplier
         4,                                       !- Number vertices
          14.0921003039, 34.2455836905, .003,     !- Vertex 1
          20.3790798187, 35.1534968801, .003,     !- Vertex 2
          20.3790798187, 35.1534968801, 4.569,    !- Vertex 3
          14.0921003039, 34.2455836905, 4.569;    !- Vertex 4
edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
2

answered 2019-01-29 16:57:49 -0600

An issue was introduced between 8.9.0 and 9.0.1 that causes the older transition programs in the 9.0.1 release to behave badly. This is fixed for the next release, but for now the workaround is to use the transition programs from 8.9.0 to get to version 8.9.0 and then use the 8.9.0 to 9.0.1 transition program from the 9.0.1 release. More information on the workaround is available here:

https://github.com/NREL/EnergyPlus/is...

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

@Jason Thanks a lot for work around tips. It's frustrating when key objects disappeared.

ngkhanh's avatar ngkhanh  ( 2019-01-29 19:14:38 -0600 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Training Workshops

Careers

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2019-01-29 06:35:29 -0600

Seen: 186 times

Last updated: Jan 29 '19