Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community

Increased WWR = Decreased Peak Tonnage?

asked 2018-07-31 12:53:25 -0500

sgudeman

61 ●3 http://www.morrisseyen...

updated 2018-08-06 08:08:58 -0500

__AmirRoth__

4436 ●5 ●17 http://bleedinggreenna...

Generated the below Sefaira response curve for window-wall ratio versus peak cooling coil load (tons), in yellow and Annual electricity consumption (kWh) in red...

The linear increase in annual energy I get... But the weird cooling coil response curve, I’m having trouble wrapping my head around. Thoughts?

Weird Response Curve

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

add a comment

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2018-08-02 10:46:55 -0500

dradair
2458 ●7 ●19 http://google.com/

what kind of space use type & interior loads do you have in the model? If heavily interior loaded the heat can get trapped inside and the higher WWR ratio (with u-values which are worse than walls, typ) allows that heat to escape. Would/can also shift when the peak load is occurring since it could be a mix of interior/envelope loads too.

edit flag offensive delete link

Comments

Ooh, good point. This does have pretty significant internal loads modeled currently... 1.5 W/sf, for a total energy end use contribution on the order of 40%. I like this explanation!

sgudeman ( 2018-08-02 15:05:25 -0500 )edit

add a comment

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Training Workshops

Careers

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2018-07-31 12:53:25 -0500

Seen: 141 times

Last updated: Jul 31 '18

Site design and logo: Copyright © 2015 Big Ladder Software LLC. All rights reserved.
The Unmet Hours and Big Ladder names and logos are trademarks of Big Ladder Software LLC.
User contributions licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0 License.

Increased WWR = Decreased Peak Tonnage? edit