Parametric Analysis Tool adds invalid LinearPowerDensity object to models
In OpenStudio 2.3.0, I used the BCL measure Create DOE Prototype Building with the following parameters
Template: 90.1-2013
Climate Zone: ASHRAE 169-2006-2A
Climate File (NECB only): Not Applicable
for three different building types
Building Type: RetailStripmall
Building Type: FullServiceRestaurant
Building Type: QuickServiceRestaurant
to create three osm files. All three osm files generated can be opened in OpenStudio with no errors. I used these osm files as input into the Parametric Analysis Tool with an EnergyPlus measure called DoNothing which doesn't modify anything.
The Parametric Analysis Tool runs fine on RetialStripmall with no errors. The IDF file generated can be imported into Openstudio to view geometry.
The Parametric Analysis Tool runs fine on FullServiceRestaurant and QuickServiceRestaurant with no errors, but the IDF files generated report the following error when importing into Openstudio.
File is not valid to draft strictness. The collection is INVALID at strictness level 'Draft', because of the errors: Field level data error of type DataType. Error is in an object of type 'ScheduleTypeLimits', named 'LinearPowerDensity', in field 4. Additional information about the error type: field-level data is of an incorrect type.
I think that the Parametric Analysis Tool must be adding the ''LinearPowerDensity' to the IDF file for FullServiceRestaurant and QuickServiceRestaurant, but why?
A little background: I'm trying to write a measure to add windows to the roofs of buildings for use with the PAT. This measure will be used in combination with other measures to automate testing of building with several varying parameters, one of which is the number of windows on the roof. In order to test my measure is adding windows appropriately, and also check the optimum results generated by the PAT, I'd really like to view the geometry of the building after my measure is applied. I know importing an IDF into OpenStudio discards a lot of information, but I only need to see if the windows were correctly placed in a roof and if the pattern of the windows on the roof is sensible. My current workaround is to go into the IDF generated by the PAT, manually delete the invalid LinearPowerDensity object, and then view the geometry. However, that's a bit of a kluge, and won't be nearly as practical for the level of automation I'm hoping for.
@mldichter this is more of a question about importing IDF files into OpenStudio than it is a PAT question. The supported workflow is OSM > IDF > EnergyPlus which results in SQL file and other simulation results. You can't cleanly import the IDF back to an OSM without losing some elements. See this post for more details. Does the IDF open in OpenStudio without those elements? Also if you want to view the geometry you can do that directly with the OSM file.
@David Goldwasser My question really boils down to "How do I prevent the PAT from adding an invalid object to the generated IDF?" or "How do I automate removal of an invalid object in the IDFs that the PAT generates?"
Also, I added a little background in the original post. I'm new to EnergyPlus, so there's a pretty good chance I'm going about this the wrong way.
The offending object is * Warning * ProcessScheduleInput: ScheduleTypeLimits="LINEARPOWERDENSITY", Unit Type="LINEARPOWERDENSITY" is invalid.
What does that object look like in your IDF file, I can't reproduce your error. IDF's from all three prototypes for 2013 2A in OpenStudio 2.3.0 import fine into the SketchUp Plugin and OS app. Here is what the object looks like for me.
ScheduleTypeLimits, LinearPowerDensity, !- Name 0, !- Lower Limit Value {BasedOnField A3} , !- Upper Limit Value {BasedOnField A3} Continuous, !- Numeric Type linearpowerdensity; !- Unit TypeAs a side note, you can view the geometry using the OSM file both in the SketchUp Plugin and in the OpenStudio application. Also as a note, the two restaurant prototype buildings have attics with sloped roofs, not sure if that is creating issues in your skylight generation.
Related to goal of your measure, are you writing that as an EnergyPlus measure? There are OpenStudio methods to generate and apply skylight patterns that could make your work easy. You cold use it as is, or if you want custom patterns, you could still use the second method to apply the custom pattern.