Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
Get started with the Help page
Ask Your Question

OA autosized using VRP and DCV

asked 2017-10-23 17:52:31 -0500

updated 2017-10-24 19:31:20 -0500

I need to model demand control ventilation in a model where the OA is autosized using the ventilation rate procedure.

If I run the model with Demand Controlled Ventilation set to No in the Controller:MechanicalVentilation object, the OA provided by the system matches the Standard 62.1 report and matches my manual calculation.

If I run the model with Demand Controlled Ventilation set to Yes in the Controller:MechanicalVentilation object, nothing changes. The OA provided by the system is unchanged.

I came across this issue on Github. It seems to me that 2. is exactly what is going in my model. I've tried to set the Minimum Outdoor Air Flow Rate in the Controller:OutdoorAir object to 0 so the OA flow rate calculated by the VRP doesn't prevent DCV.

The results show that DCV is working but the hourly OA quantities at maximum occupancy (schedule fraction = 0.95) is about 60% of the flow calculated following the VRP. Where is the difference coming from?

image description

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete



Which "System Outdoor Air Method" did you specify in the Controller:Mechanical Ventilation object? VRP, I assume? When you say, " about 60% of the flow calculated following the VRP," is that based on a VRP calculation at design conditions, or on a VRP calculation that is dynamic based on the simulated dynamic values for outside air, primary air at the connected zones?

Molly Curtz gravatar imageMolly Curtz ( 2017-10-24 00:57:56 -0500 )edit

It doesn't make sense to me that the minimum airflow fraction would change depending on whether "minimum outside airflow rate" is autosized. Any thoughts on why that is? How is the minimum flow fraction specified? And, is your total system flow the same in both the cases shown in the graph?

Molly Curtz gravatar imageMolly Curtz ( 2017-10-24 01:05:20 -0500 )edit

@Molly Curtz, I found out what was going on with the minimum airflow fraction, a DesignSpecification:OutdoorAir object was inadvertently attached the the air terminal.

Jeremy gravatar imageJeremy ( 2017-10-24 19:44:36 -0500 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted

answered 2017-10-24 19:42:03 -0500

updated 2017-10-25 13:49:07 -0500

For design purposes, EnergyPlus uses the total zone primary airflow for Vps, as required by ASHRAE 62.1. During the simulation, Vps is the actual total supply flow which can be significantly different.

Also, during the simulation Vpz is based on the mass flow rate entering the zone converted to volume flow rate using the air density entering the zone.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer


Question Tools

1 follower


Asked: 2017-10-23 17:52:31 -0500

Seen: 265 times

Last updated: Oct 25 '17