Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
 | 1 | initial version |
@Ranjani, this option, if checked, does not result in a valid compliance run.
It is available for research/early phase analysis, and it results in the E+ model capacity fields be specified as 'Autosize' instead of using the values that are defined in the CBECC-Com UI. Using a text diff tool and comparing idfs both w/ and w/o this option checked should show you the impact of this option clearly.
Checking this option does not result in the HVAC capacities of the model be changed to match the autosized E+ capacities, it only impacts the E+ simulations. This is why the - ap - HVACSecondary.csv files are the same. Equipment efficiencies are preserved in the simulation when you select this option, so you should see in the idf that they are not changed.
This utility of this option is pretty limited to research purposes. If you are struggling with sizing, you can enable this option to see what E+ sizes systems, and use that to inform your design. However, there are many nuances to E+ sizing, and some shortcomings in what this option offers, so you may need to edit the idf file further to make it useful for your situation.
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
@Ranjani, this option, if checked, does not result in a valid compliance run.
It is available for research/early phase analysis, and it results in the E+ model capacity fields be specified as 'Autosize' instead of using the values that are defined in the CBECC-Com UI. Using a text diff tool and comparing idfs both w/ and w/o this option checked should show you the impact of this option clearly.
Checking this option does not result in the HVAC capacities of the model be changed to match the autosized E+ capacities, it only impacts the E+ simulations. This is why the - ap - HVACSecondary.csv files are the same. Equipment efficiencies are preserved in the simulation when you select this option, so you should see in the idf that they are not changed.
This utility of this option is pretty limited to research purposes. If you are struggling with sizing, you can enable this option to see what E+ sizes systems, and use that to inform your design. However, there are many nuances to E+ sizing, and some shortcomings in what this option offers, so you may need to edit the idf file further to make it useful for your situation.
| | 3 | No.3 Revision |
@Ranjani, this option, if checked, does not result in a valid compliance run.
It is available for research/early phase analysis, and it results in the E+ model capacity fields be specified as 'Autosize' instead of using the values that are defined in the CBECC-Com UI. Using a text diff tool and comparing idfs both w/ and w/o this option checked should show you the impact of this option clearly.
Checking this option does not result in the HVAC capacities of the model changed to match the autosized E+ capacities, it only impacts the E+ simulations. This is why the - ap - HVACSecondary.csv files are the same. Equipment efficiencies are preserved in the simulation when you select this option, so you should see in the idf that they are not changed.
This The utility of this option is pretty limited to research purposes. If you are struggling with sizing, you can enable this option to see what E+ sizes systems, and use that to inform your design. However, there are many nuances to E+ sizing, and some shortcomings in what this option offers, so you may need to edit the idf file further to make it useful for your situation.
