Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
 | 1 | initial version |
If my answer doesn't help clear things up, perhaps you can share your model. Or post the errors. The measure should be robust, but it is difficult to anticipate everything.
Hello, thanks again for your consideration. I re-started the process with some fresh geometry and, perhaps more importantly, a lighter set of libraries resident in the model. I had loaded the master set, and the model was over 10MB.
(As a side note, with the new lighter model, OS is far more responsive -- it had been taking 15 minutes, for instance, to open the list of downloaded measures. Could this performance boost be related to the smaller loaded library set?)
I re-ran both the AEDG radiant and AEDG WSHP measures on separate forked files, and simulations complete in both cases. So for one reason or another, I now have a workflow working - now to make the building represent something reasonable.
Thanks again for your availability--it makes all the difference. -N.
