Revision history [back]

It's failing on this line.

thermal_conductance = construction.thermalConductance.get

The last time I saw that happen is when an air wall was used on the exterior of the building (which shouldn't generally shouldn't be done). For any model that ran through EnergyPlus we generally should be able to calculate thermal conductance. Another possible cause could be special characters in particular an apostrophe in the construction name.

Here is an issue about air walls related to this.

And here is a link to the issue about the apostrophe.

It's failing on this line.

thermal_conductance = construction.thermalConductance.get

The last time I saw that happen is when an air wall was used on the exterior of the building (which shouldn't generally shouldn't be done). For any model that ran through EnergyPlus we generally should be able to calculate thermal conductance. Another possible cause could be special characters in particular an apostrophe in the construction name.

Here is an issue about air walls related to this.

And here is a link to the issue about the apostrophe.

It's failing on this line.

thermal_conductance = construction.thermalConductance.get

The last time I saw that happen is when an air wall was used on the exterior of the building (which shouldn't generally shouldn't be done). For any model that ran through EnergyPlus we generally should be able to calculate thermal conductance. Another possible cause could be special characters in particular an apostrophe in the construction name.

Here is an issue about air walls related to this.

And here is a link to the issue about the apostrophe.

Also the current code handles this in an if statement so if it can't find thermal conductance it will just show a blank value and show will continue to process the rest of the envelope table. The latest iteration install should have this fix.

It's failing on this line.

thermal_conductance = construction.thermalConductance.get

The last time I saw that happen is when an air wall was used on the exterior of the building (which shouldn't generally shouldn't be done). For any model that ran through EnergyPlus we generally should be able to calculate thermal conductance. Another possible cause could be special characters in particular an apostrophe in the construction name.

Here is an issue about air walls related to this.

And here is a link to the issue about the apostrophe.

Also the current code handles this in an if statement so if it can't find thermal conductance it will just show a blank value and will continue to process the rest of the envelope table. The latest iteration install should have this fix.