Question-and-Answer Resource for the Building Energy Modeling Community
 | 1 | initial version |
@Adrià González-Esteve, looks like you're comparing:
Yet the E+ reported Assembly U-factor and Assembly SHGC numbers (in blue) seem to match:
SHGC (25%) has remained pretty constant (at least for fixed fenestration) over several 90.1 editions - they seem to match here.
Unsure which 90.1 version you're looking into (e.g. 2010? 2016?). But the E+ reported Assembly U-Factor results seem to match 90.1 2016 requirements (or earlier) for nonresidential, CZ 3C (once rounded):
Hope this helps, Adrià.
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
@Adrià González-Esteve, looks like you're comparing:
Yet the E+ reported Assembly U-factor and Assembly SHGC numbers (in blue) seem to match:match?
SHGC (25%) has remained pretty constant (at least for fixed fenestration) over several 90.1 editions - they for CZ < 4. They seem to match here.
Unsure which 90.1 version you're looking into (e.g. 2010? 2016?). But the 2010?). The E+ reported Assembly U-Factor results seem to match 90.1 2016 requirements (or earlier) (and earlier?) for nonresidential, CZ 3C (once rounded):
Maybe double-check that you're comparing the same 90.1 versions (e.g. 2010 vs 2010, 2016 vs 2016)?
Note that E+ is listing the subsurfaces as NFRC type "curtainwall" ...
Hope this helps, Adrià.
